Afghanistan vs Iraq: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP
Afghanistan
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Iraq
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
89th
Iraq rank
89th
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP over time
- Afghanistan
- Iraq
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Iraq, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Iraq has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 89th and Iraq ranks 89th of 184 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Iraq |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp, Afghanistan or Iraq?
- Afghanistan, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Iraq as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp between Afghanistan and Iraq?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Iraq?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Iraq rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp?
- Afghanistan ranks 89th and Iraq ranks 89th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.