Afghanistan vs Morocco: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP
Afghanistan
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Morocco
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
89th
Morocco rank
87th
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP over time
- Afghanistan
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Afghanistan, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 89th and Morocco ranks 87th of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Morocco |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp, Afghanistan or Morocco?
- Morocco, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Afghanistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp between Afghanistan and Morocco?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Morocco?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Morocco rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp?
- Afghanistan ranks 89th and Morocco ranks 87th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.