Cuba vs Ghana: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP
Cuba
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2020
Ghana
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Cuba rank
32nd
Ghana rank
34th
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP over time
- Cuba
- Ghana
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Ghana, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.7 times Ghana's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ghana ahead.
Cuba ranks 32nd and Ghana ranks 34th of 184 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Ghana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Ghana |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Ghana |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Ghana |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp, Cuba or Ghana?
- Cuba, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Ghana as of 2020.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp between Cuba and Ghana?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Ghana?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Cuba and Ghana rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp?
- Cuba ranks 32nd and Ghana ranks 34th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.