Latvia vs Poland: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP
Latvia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Poland
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia rank
89th
Poland rank
89th
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP over time
- Latvia
- Poland
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Poland, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 89th and Poland ranks 89th of 184 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp, Latvia or Poland?
- Latvia, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Poland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp between Latvia and Poland?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Poland?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Poland rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 89th and Poland ranks 89th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.