Libya vs Tajikistan: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP
Libya
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Tajikistan
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Libya rank
89th
Tajikistan rank
89th
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP over time
- Libya
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Tajikistan, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 89th and Tajikistan ranks 89th of 184 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp, Libya or Tajikistan?
- Libya, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Tajikistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp between Libya and Tajikistan?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Tajikistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Tajikistan rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp?
- Libya ranks 89th and Tajikistan ranks 89th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.