Libya vs Uzbekistan: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP
Libya
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Libya rank
89th
Uzbekistan rank
89th
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP over time
- Libya
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 89th and Uzbekistan ranks 89th of 184 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp, Libya or Uzbekistan?
- Libya, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp between Libya and Uzbekistan?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Uzbekistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Uzbekistan rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp?
- Libya ranks 89th and Uzbekistan ranks 89th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.