Mongolia vs Serbia: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP
Mongolia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Serbia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Mongolia rank
54th
Serbia rank
55th
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP over time
- Mongolia
- Serbia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Serbia, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 54th and Serbia ranks 55th of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp, Mongolia or Serbia?
- Mongolia, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp between Mongolia and Serbia?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Mongolia and Serbia rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp?
- Mongolia ranks 54th and Serbia ranks 55th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.