Burkina Faso vs New Zealand: Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Burkina Faso
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
New Zealand
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Burkina Faso rank
89th
New Zealand rank
89th
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Burkina Faso
- New Zealand
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Zealand, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Zealand ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 89th and New Zealand ranks 89th of 147 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Burkina Faso or New Zealand?
- Burkina Faso, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Zealand as of 2001.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Burkina Faso and New Zealand?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and New Zealand?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Burkina Faso and New Zealand rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
- Burkina Faso ranks 89th and New Zealand ranks 89th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.