China, Hong Kong SAR vs Serbia: Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
Serbia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
89th
Serbia rank
89th

Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Serbia
02505007501.0k199120072023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Serbia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2008 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 89th and Serbia ranks 89th of 147 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 75 % change on previous year 18.47 % change on previous year 56.53 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s -66.67 % change on previous year 226.79 % change on previous year 293.45 % change on previous year Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, China, Hong Kong SAR or Serbia?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Serbia as of 2017.
What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between China, Hong Kong SAR and Serbia?
0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Serbia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2017.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Serbia rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 89th and Serbia ranks 89th of 147 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Serbia: Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/serbia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Serbia: Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 4,869 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.