Côte d'Ivoire vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate

Côte d'Ivoire
300 % change on previous year
in 2024
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
20.49 % change on previous year
in 2024
Côte d'Ivoire rank
6th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
8th

Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time

  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0200400600199120072024

How they compare

Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 300 % change on previous year against 20.49 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 279.51 % change on previous year.

That makes Côte d'Ivoire's figure about 14.6 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 23 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 6th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th of 147 countries.

Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Côte d'Ivoire Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 51.64 % change on previous year 30.8 % change on previous year 20.84 % change on previous year Côte d'Ivoire
2000s 72.65 % change on previous year -8.7 % change on previous year 81.35 % change on previous year Côte d'Ivoire
2010s 82.16 % change on previous year 4.36 % change on previous year 77.79 % change on previous year Côte d'Ivoire
2020s 104.7 % change on previous year 4.38 % change on previous year 100.32 % change on previous year Côte d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Côte d'Ivoire or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Côte d'Ivoire, at 300 % change on previous year against 20.49 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Côte d'Ivoire and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
279.51 % change on previous year, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Côte d'Ivoire and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 6th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th of 147 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d'Ivoire vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/cote-d-ivoire-3/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-emissions-n2o-annual-growth-rate/cote-d-ivoire-3/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Côte d'Ivoire vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
179 places, 4,869 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.