Sweden vs Turkmenistan: Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Sweden
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
Turkmenistan
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
Sweden rank
89th
Turkmenistan rank
89th
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Sweden
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Sweden currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.
Sweden ranks 89th and Turkmenistan ranks 89th of 147 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Sweden or Turkmenistan?
- Sweden, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turkmenistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Sweden and Turkmenistan?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Turkmenistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1999.
- How do Sweden and Turkmenistan rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
- Sweden ranks 89th and Turkmenistan ranks 89th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.