Sweden vs Uruguay: Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Sweden
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
Uruguay
-100 % change on previous year
in 2024
Sweden rank
89th
Uruguay rank
89th
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate over time
- Sweden
- Uruguay
How they compare
Sweden currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uruguay, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Sweden ranks 89th and Uruguay ranks 89th of 147 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -28.57 % change on previous year | 25 % change on previous year | 53.57 % change on previous year | Uruguay |
| 2000s | -100 % change on previous year | -50 % change on previous year | 50 % change on previous year | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate, Sweden or Uruguay?
- Sweden, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate between Sweden and Uruguay?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Uruguay?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2009.
- How do Sweden and Uruguay rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (n2o), annual growth rate?
- Sweden ranks 89th and Uruguay ranks 89th of 147 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.