Afghanistan vs Latvia: Woody savanna — Emissions
Afghanistan
0 kt
in 2024
Latvia
0 kt
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
92nd
Latvia rank
92nd
Woody savanna — Emissions over time
- Afghanistan
- Latvia
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 92nd and Latvia ranks 92nd of 220 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0002 kt | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0011 kt | 0.0011 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, Afghanistan or Latvia?
- Afghanistan, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between Afghanistan and Latvia?
- 0 kt, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Latvia rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?
- Afghanistan ranks 92nd and Latvia ranks 92nd of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.