Burkina Faso vs Latvia: Woody savanna — Emissions
Burkina Faso
0 kt
in 2024
Latvia
0 kt
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
92nd
Latvia rank
92nd
Woody savanna — Emissions over time
- Burkina Faso
- Latvia
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 92nd and Latvia ranks 92nd of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2254 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.2251 kt | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 0.0215 kt | 0.0011 kt | 0.0204 kt | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, Burkina Faso or Latvia?
- Burkina Faso, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between Burkina Faso and Latvia?
- 0 kt, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Latvia rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?
- Burkina Faso ranks 92nd and Latvia ranks 92nd of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.