Chile vs South Sudan: Woody savanna — Emissions
Chile
0.0072 kt
in 2024
South Sudan
0.0071 kt
in 2024
Chile rank
53rd
South Sudan rank
54th
Woody savanna — Emissions over time
- Chile
- South Sudan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.0072 kt against 0.0071 kt in South Sudan, a difference of 0.0001 kt.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 53rd and South Sudan ranks 54th of 220 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0162 kt | 0.012 kt | 0.0042 kt | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.0134 kt | 0.0086 kt | 0.0048 kt | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, Chile or South Sudan?
- Chile, at 0.0072 kt against 0.0071 kt in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between Chile and South Sudan?
- 0.0001 kt, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Chile and South Sudan rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?
- Chile ranks 53rd and South Sudan ranks 54th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.