China, Hong Kong SAR vs Kenya: Woody savanna — Emissions
China, Hong Kong SAR
0 kt
in 2024
Kenya
0 kt
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
92nd
Kenya rank
92nd
Woody savanna — Emissions over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Kenya
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Kenya, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Kenya ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 92nd and Kenya ranks 92nd of 220 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0307 kt | 0.0305 kt | Kenya |
| 2000s | 0.0002 kt | 0.006 kt | 0.0058 kt | Kenya |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0007 kt | 0.0006 kt | Kenya |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0003 kt | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Kenya?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Kenya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Kenya?
- 0 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Kenya?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Kenya rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 92nd and Kenya ranks 92nd of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.