Kazakhstan vs Sweden: Woody savanna — Emissions
Kazakhstan
0 kt
in 2024
Sweden
0 kt
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
92nd
Sweden rank
92nd
Woody savanna — Emissions over time
- Kazakhstan
- Sweden
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 92nd and Sweden ranks 92nd of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0315 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0313 kt | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0.0033 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0031 kt | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0.0003 kt | 0.0008 kt | 0.0004 kt | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0.0008 kt | 0 kt | 0.0008 kt | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, Kazakhstan or Sweden?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between Kazakhstan and Sweden?
- 0 kt, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sweden?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Sweden rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?
- Kazakhstan ranks 92nd and Sweden ranks 92nd of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.