Mauritania vs Sweden: Woody savanna — Emissions
Mauritania
0 kt
in 2024
Sweden
0 kt
in 2024
Mauritania rank
92nd
Sweden rank
92nd
Woody savanna — Emissions over time
- Mauritania
- Sweden
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.
Mauritania ranks 92nd and Sweden ranks 92nd of 220 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0002 kt | Sweden |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0002 kt | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0008 kt | 0.0008 kt | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, Mauritania or Sweden?
- Mauritania, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between Mauritania and Sweden?
- 0 kt, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mauritania and Sweden rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?
- Mauritania ranks 92nd and Sweden ranks 92nd of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.