Namibia vs Uzbekistan: Woody savanna — Emissions
Namibia
0 kt
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0 kt
in 2024
Namibia rank
92nd
Uzbekistan rank
92nd
Woody savanna — Emissions over time
- Namibia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 92nd and Uzbekistan ranks 92nd of 220 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1401 kt | 0.0039 kt | 0.1362 kt | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0.0213 kt | 0.0008 kt | 0.0205 kt | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, Namibia or Uzbekistan?
- Namibia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between Namibia and Uzbekistan?
- 0 kt, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Uzbekistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Uzbekistan rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?
- Namibia ranks 92nd and Uzbekistan ranks 92nd of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.