Serbia vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Emissions
Serbia
0.0027 kt
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.0052 kt
in 2024
Serbia rank
58th
Zimbabwe rank
55th
Woody savanna — Emissions over time
- Serbia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0052 kt against 0.0027 kt in Serbia, a difference of 0.0025 kt.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.9 times Serbia's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 58th and Zimbabwe ranks 55th of 220 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0024 kt | 0.0081 kt | 0.0057 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.0011 kt | 0.0082 kt | 0.0071 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.0009 kt | 0.0025 kt | 0.0016 kt | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, Serbia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.0052 kt against 0.0027 kt in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between Serbia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0025 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Zimbabwe?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Serbia and Zimbabwe rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?
- Serbia ranks 58th and Zimbabwe ranks 55th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.