Costa Rica vs Cuba: Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per capita
Costa Rica
0 kt per person
in 2024
Cuba
0 kt per person
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
32nd
Cuba rank
31st
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Costa Rica
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 32nd and Cuba ranks 31st of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Cuba in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per capita, Costa Rica or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per capita between Costa Rica and Cuba?
- 0 kt per person, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Cuba?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Cuba rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Costa Rica ranks 32nd and Cuba ranks 31st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.