Lithuania vs Morocco: Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per capita
Lithuania
0 kt per person
in 2024
Morocco
0 kt per person
in 2024
Lithuania rank
85th
Morocco rank
85th
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per capita over time
- Lithuania
- Morocco
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Morocco, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 85th and Morocco ranks 85th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Morocco |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Morocco |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per capita, Lithuania or Morocco?
- Lithuania, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Morocco as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per capita between Lithuania and Morocco?
- 0 kt per person, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Morocco?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Morocco rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 85th and Morocco ranks 85th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.