Uruguay vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre

Uruguay
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay rank
75th
Zimbabwe rank
72nd

Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre over time

  • Uruguay
  • Zimbabwe
000000199020062023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.5 times Uruguay's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Uruguay ranks 75th and Zimbabwe ranks 72nd of 187 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Uruguay Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre, Uruguay or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2023.
What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre between Uruguay and Zimbabwe?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uruguay and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Uruguay and Zimbabwe rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Uruguay ranks 75th and Zimbabwe ranks 72nd of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Uruguay vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/uruguay/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/uruguay/zimbabwe/">Uruguay vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,279 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.