Afghanistan vs Uruguay: Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP
Afghanistan
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Uruguay
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Afghanistan rank
84th
Uruguay rank
84th
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP over time
- Afghanistan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Uruguay, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 84th and Uruguay ranks 84th of 184 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp, Afghanistan or Uruguay?
- Afghanistan, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp between Afghanistan and Uruguay?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Uruguay?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Uruguay rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp?
- Afghanistan ranks 84th and Uruguay ranks 84th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.