Eritrea vs Senegal: Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP
Eritrea
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Senegal
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eritrea rank
84th
Senegal rank
84th
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Senegal
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Senegal, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Senegal has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 84th and Senegal ranks 84th of 184 countries.
Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Senegal |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Senegal |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp, Eritrea or Senegal?
- Eritrea, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Senegal as of 2011.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp between Eritrea and Senegal?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Senegal?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Senegal rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 84th and Senegal ranks 84th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.