Fiji vs Latvia: Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP
Fiji
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Fiji rank
84th
Latvia rank
84th
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP over time
- Fiji
- Latvia
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 84th and Latvia ranks 84th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Fiji |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Fiji |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp, Fiji or Latvia?
- Fiji, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp between Fiji and Latvia?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Latvia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Fiji and Latvia rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp?
- Fiji ranks 84th and Latvia ranks 84th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.