Latvia vs Rwanda: Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP
Latvia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Rwanda
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia rank
84th
Rwanda rank
84th
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP over time
- Latvia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Rwanda ahead.
Latvia ranks 84th and Rwanda ranks 84th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp, Latvia or Rwanda?
- Latvia, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp between Latvia and Rwanda?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Rwanda?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Rwanda rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 84th and Rwanda ranks 84th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.