Poland vs Tunisia: Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP
Poland
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Tunisia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Poland rank
84th
Tunisia rank
84th
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP over time
- Poland
- Tunisia
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Tunisia, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tunisia ahead.
Poland ranks 84th and Tunisia ranks 84th of 184 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp, Poland or Tunisia?
- Poland, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp between Poland and Tunisia?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Tunisia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Poland and Tunisia rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp?
- Poland ranks 84th and Tunisia ranks 84th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (N2O) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.