Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Import quantity

Australia and New Zealand
1,881 t
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
4,543 t
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
15th
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
2nd

Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Import quantity over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k201020162023

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 4,543 t against 1,881 t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 2,662 t.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 2.4 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 15th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd of 122 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
2010s 2,738 t 2,618 t 120.53 t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 1,976 t 3,610 t 1,634 t Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — import quantity, Australia and New Zealand or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 4,543 t against 1,881 t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — import quantity between Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
2,662 t, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — import quantity?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 15th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 2nd of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Import quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wool-degreased-or-carbonized-not-carded-or-combed-import-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wool-degreased-or-carbonized-not-carded-or-combed-import-quantity/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Import quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
164 places, 1,877 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.