Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Import quantity

Barbados
0.02 t
in 2022
Zimbabwe
0.01 t
in 2022
Barbados rank
107th
Zimbabwe rank
108th

Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Import quantity over time

  • Barbados
  • Zimbabwe
00.511.52201020162022

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.02 t against 0.01 t in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.01 t.

That makes Barbados's figure about 2.0 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Barbados ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 108th of 122 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t 0.6414 t 0.6414 t Zimbabwe
2020s 0.02 t 0.01 t 0.01 t Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — import quantity, Barbados or Zimbabwe?
Barbados, at 0.02 t against 0.01 t in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
What is the difference in wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — import quantity between Barbados and Zimbabwe?
0.01 t, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Zimbabwe?
8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
How do Barbados and Zimbabwe rank globally for wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — import quantity?
Barbados ranks 107th and Zimbabwe ranks 108th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Import quantity. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wool-degreased-or-carbonized-not-carded-or-combed-import-quantity/barbados/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wool-degreased-or-carbonized-not-carded-or-combed-import-quantity/barbados/zimbabwe/">Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Import quantity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
164 places, 1,877 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.