China, Hong Kong SAR vs Ecuador: Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Other uses

China, Hong Kong SAR
8.38 t
in 2023
Ecuador
16.79 t
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
56th
Ecuador rank
53rd

Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Other uses over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Ecuador
0255075100125201020162023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 16.79 t against 8.38 t in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 8.41 t.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 2.0 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2010 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 56th and Ecuador ranks 53rd of 85 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Ecuador Difference Ahead
2010s 66.31 t 38.24 t 28.07 t China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 4.22 t 25.45 t 21.23 t Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — other uses, China, Hong Kong SAR or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 16.79 t against 8.38 t in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — other uses between China, Hong Kong SAR and Ecuador?
8.41 t, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Ecuador?
8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Ecuador rank globally for wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — other uses?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 56th and Ecuador ranks 53rd of 85 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Other uses (non-food). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Ecuador: Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Other uses. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wool-degreased-or-carbonized-not-carded-or-combed-other-uses-non-food/china-hong-kong-sar/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wool-degreased-or-carbonized-not-carded-or-combed-other-uses-non-food/china-hong-kong-sar/ecuador/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Ecuador: Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Other uses</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Other uses (non-food)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
124 places, 1,353 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.