Argentina vs Belarus: Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Residuals
Argentina
-300 t
in 2023
Belarus
-263 t
in 2023
Argentina rank
115th
Belarus rank
114th
Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Residuals over time
- Argentina
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports -263 t against -300 t in Argentina, a difference of 37 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Belarus ahead.
Argentina ranks 115th and Belarus ranks 114th of 132 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -1,041 t | -118.1 t | 922.7 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | -209.25 t | -456 t | 246.75 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — residuals, Argentina or Belarus?
- Belarus, at -263 t against -300 t in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — residuals between Argentina and Belarus?
- 37 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Belarus?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Belarus rank globally for wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — residuals?
- Argentina ranks 115th and Belarus ranks 114th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.