Argentina vs Jordan: Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Residuals
Argentina
-300 t
in 2023
Jordan
-131 t
in 2023
Argentina rank
115th
Jordan rank
112th
Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Residuals over time
- Argentina
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports -131 t against -300 t in Argentina, a difference of 169 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 115th and Jordan ranks 112th of 132 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -1,041 t | -240.7 t | 800.1 t | Jordan |
| 2020s | -209.25 t | -77.75 t | 131.5 t | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — residuals, Argentina or Jordan?
- Jordan, at -131 t against -300 t in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — residuals between Argentina and Jordan?
- 169 t, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Jordan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Jordan rank globally for wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — residuals?
- Argentina ranks 115th and Jordan ranks 112th of 132 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.