Caribbean vs Eswatini: Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Residuals
Caribbean
0 t
in 2023
Eswatini
3 t
in 2023
Caribbean rank
4th
Eswatini rank
3rd
Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Residuals over time
- Caribbean
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 3 t against 0 t in Caribbean, a difference of 3 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Caribbean ahead.
Caribbean ranks 4th and Eswatini ranks 3rd of 28 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Caribbean averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.25 t | 0 t | 0.25 t | Caribbean |
| 2020s | 0 t | 2.25 t | 2.25 t | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — residuals, Caribbean or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 3 t against 0 t in Caribbean as of 2023.
- What is the difference in wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — residuals between Caribbean and Eswatini?
- 3 t, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Eswatini?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Eswatini rank globally for wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — residuals?
- Caribbean ranks 4th and Eswatini ranks 3rd of 28 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.