Melanesia vs Namibia: Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Residuals
Melanesia
0 t
in 2022
Namibia
0 t
in 2023
Melanesia rank
4th
Namibia rank
7th
Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Residuals over time
- Melanesia
- Namibia
How they compare
Melanesia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Melanesia ahead.
Melanesia ranks 4th and Namibia ranks 7th of 33 regions.
Melanesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -1.89 t | -10 t | 8.11 t | Melanesia |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — residuals, Melanesia or Namibia?
- Melanesia, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — residuals between Melanesia and Namibia?
- 0 t, with Melanesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and Namibia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Melanesia and Namibia rank globally for wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — residuals?
- Melanesia ranks 4th and Namibia ranks 7th of 33 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wool, degreased or carbonized, not carded or combed — Residuals. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Commodity balances (CB) present a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's non-food supply during a specified reference period.