Absolute change co2 in Cuba
Cuba: Absolute change co2 was 969,964 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
969,964
Change on year
up 358.1%
World rank
38th
of 215 countries
All-time high
8.02 million
in 1957
All-time low
-6.21 million
in 1992
Years of data
168
1857–2024
Absolute change co2 in Cuba, 1857–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, absolute change co2 in Cuba stood at 969,964.
The figure is up 358.1% on the previous year and up 283.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, absolute change co2 in Cuba peaked at 8.02 million in 1957 and was at its lowest, -6.21 million, in 1992.
That places Cuba 38th out of 215 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Absolute change co2 in Cuba, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1857 | -23,789 | — |
| 1858 | -22,318 | -6.2% |
| 1859 | -20,937 | -6.2% |
| 1860 | -19,641 | -6.2% |
| 1861 | 144,321 | -834.8% |
| 1862 | 150,105 | +4.0% |
| 1863 | -221,570 | -247.6% |
| 1864 | 240,598 | -208.6% |
| 1865 | -22,506 | -109.4% |
| 1866 | 3,142 | -114.0% |
| 1867 | 42,335 | +1247.4% |
| 1868 | -34,305 | -181.0% |
| 1869 | 85,142 | -348.2% |
| 1870 | -59,070 | -169.4% |
| 1871 | -17,008 | -71.2% |
| 1872 | 9,524 | -156.0% |
| 1873 | 23,301 | +144.7% |
| 1874 | 8,920 | -61.7% |
| 1875 | 1,921 | -78.5% |
| 1876 | -90,735 | -4823.3% |
| 1877 | 27,385 | -130.2% |
| 1878 | 97,041 | +254.4% |
| 1879 | 10,808 | -88.9% |
| 1880 | -107,436 | -1094.0% |
| 1881 | 16,612 | -115.5% |
| 1882 | 8,771 | -47.2% |
| 1883 | -18,720 | -313.4% |
| 1884 | -11,003 | -41.2% |
| 1885 | 23,724 | -315.6% |
| 1886 | -33,560 | -241.5% |
| 1887 | 67,180 | -300.2% |
| 1888 | 72,835 | +8.4% |
| 1889 | 77,744 | +6.7% |
| 1890 | -21,526 | -127.7% |
| 1891 | 152,054 | -806.4% |
| 1892 | 97,755 | -35.7% |
| 1893 | -53,343 | -154.6% |
| 1894 | 74,269 | -239.2% |
| 1895 | -46,295 | -162.3% |
| 1896 | -197,712 | +327.1% |
| 1897 | -43,535 | -78.0% |
| 1898 | 82,550 | -289.6% |
| 1899 | 103,793 | +25.7% |
| 1900 | 2,518 | -97.6% |
| 1901 | 72,602 | +2783.3% |
| 1902 | -24,086 | -133.2% |
| 1903 | 221,511 | -1019.7% |
| 1904 | 134,835 | -39.1% |
| 1905 | 296,826 | +120.1% |
| 1906 | 238,140 | -19.8% |
| 1907 | 62,327 | -73.8% |
| 1908 | -49,016 | -178.6% |
| 1909 | 107,547 | -319.4% |
| 1910 | 381,848 | +255.1% |
| 1911 | 432,556 | +13.3% |
| 1912 | 460,181 | +6.4% |
| 1913 | 9,811 | -97.9% |
| 1914 | -275,445 | -2907.5% |
| 1915 | 121,295 | -144.0% |
| 1916 | 507,007 | +318.0% |
| 1917 | 342,083 | -32.5% |
| 1918 | -90,597 | -126.5% |
| 1919 | -1.21 million | +1231.0% |
| 1920 | 942,102 | -178.1% |
| 1921 | -2.12 million | -324.7% |
| 1922 | -131,841 | -93.8% |
| 1923 | 415,844 | -415.4% |
| 1924 | -225,194 | -154.2% |
| 1925 | 132,261 | -158.7% |
| 1926 | -67,728 | -151.2% |
| 1927 | 16,307 | -124.1% |
| 1928 | -57,513 | -452.7% |
| 1929 | -734,667 | +1177.4% |
| 1930 | 438,258 | -159.7% |
| 1931 | -338,567 | -177.3% |
| 1932 | -186,604 | -44.9% |
| 1933 | -15,312 | -91.8% |
| 1934 | 57,421 | -475.0% |
| 1935 | -22,968 | -140.0% |
| 1936 | 130,151 | -666.7% |
| 1937 | 61,247 | -52.9% |
| 1938 | -99,527 | -262.5% |
| 1939 | -179,916 | +80.8% |
| 1940 | -22,967 | -87.2% |
| 1941 | -118,905 | +417.7% |
| 1942 | -92,259 | -22.4% |
| 1943 | 264,128 | -386.3% |
| 1944 | -206,902 | -178.3% |
| 1945 | 29,462 | -114.2% |
| 1946 | -79,361 | -369.4% |
| 1947 | 79,342 | -200.0% |
| 1948 | -137,508 | -273.3% |
| 1949 | -80,475 | -41.5% |
| 1950 | 5.30 million | -6688.6% |
| 1951 | 827,988 | -84.4% |
| 1952 | -187,012 | -122.6% |
| 1953 | -91,541 | -51.1% |
| 1954 | -241,884 | +164.2% |
| 1955 | 828,005 | -442.3% |
| 1956 | -934,974 | -212.9% |
| 1957 | 8.02 million | -958.2% |
| 1958 | 4.13 million | -48.5% |
| 1959 | -2.33 million | -156.4% |
| 1960 | -1.98 million | -15.1% |
| 1961 | -1.52 million | -23.2% |
| 1962 | 1.99 million | -230.8% |
| 1963 | -1.13 million | -156.8% |
| 1964 | 1.25 million | -211.0% |
| 1965 | 315,134 | -74.9% |
| 1966 | 575,248 | +82.5% |
| 1967 | 567,495 | -1.3% |
| 1968 | 282,642 | -50.2% |
| 1969 | 1.22 million | +333.0% |
| 1970 | 1.41 million | +15.3% |
| 1971 | 934,572 | -33.8% |
| 1972 | 1.19 million | +27.2% |
| 1973 | 1.60 million | +34.4% |
| 1974 | 512,718 | -67.9% |
| 1975 | 4.15 million | +709.7% |
| 1976 | 157,584 | -96.2% |
| 1977 | 2.18 million | +1281.6% |
| 1978 | 1.29 million | -40.9% |
| 1979 | 1.02 million | -20.5% |
| 1980 | -310,522 | -130.3% |
| 1981 | 1.35 million | -534.6% |
| 1982 | 1.80 million | +33.7% |
| 1983 | -3.71 million | -305.5% |
| 1984 | 1.76 million | -147.5% |
| 1985 | -24,826 | -101.4% |
| 1986 | 990,886 | -4091.3% |
| 1987 | 386,508 | -61.0% |
| 1988 | 1.68 million | +335.5% |
| 1989 | 102,612 | -93.9% |
| 1990 | -6.08 million | -6026.5% |
| 1991 | -2.68 million | -56.0% |
| 1992 | -6.21 million | +131.9% |
| 1993 | -964,784 | -84.5% |
| 1994 | 1.64 million | -269.6% |
| 1995 | 1.44 million | -11.9% |
| 1996 | 435,434 | -69.8% |
| 1997 | 1.52 million | +249.1% |
| 1998 | -515,226 | -133.9% |
| 1999 | 180,696 | -135.1% |
| 2000 | 809,974 | +348.3% |
| 2001 | -618,240 | -176.3% |
| 2002 | 498,296 | -180.6% |
| 2003 | 375,128 | -24.7% |
| 2004 | -1.01 million | -370.5% |
| 2005 | 1.17 million | -215.0% |
| 2006 | 1.08 million | -7.8% |
| 2007 | -1.06 million | -198.3% |
| 2008 | 2.01 million | -290.5% |
| 2009 | 522,546 | -74.1% |
| 2010 | 4.78 million | +815.0% |
| 2011 | -3.97 million | -183.0% |
| 2012 | 400,062 | -110.1% |
| 2013 | -1.58 million | -495.4% |
| 2014 | -527,544 | -66.6% |
| 2015 | 1.72 million | -426.9% |
| 2016 | -1.32 million | -176.5% |
| 2017 | -3.21 million | +143.6% |
| 2018 | -1.54 million | -52.1% |
| 2019 | -532,554 | -65.4% |
| 2020 | -1.21 million | +126.5% |
| 2021 | 1.27 million | -205.1% |
| 2022 | 709,672 | -44.0% |
| 2023 | 211,732 | -70.2% |
| 2024 | 969,964 | +358.1% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 969,964 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 98,432, 9.9× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 969,964 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 109,750, 8.8× the median. (38 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Absolute change co2 in Cuba changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | +6688.6% | -80,475 | 5.30 million |
| 1990 | -6026.5% | 102,612 | -6.08 million |
| 1876 | -4823.3% | 1,921 | -90,735 |
| 1986 | +4091.3% | -24,826 | 990,886 |
| 1914 | -2907.5% | 9,811 | -275,445 |
| 1901 | +2783.3% | 2,518 | 72,602 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | -22,348 | -23,789 | -20,937 | 3 |
| 1860s | 36,762 | -221,570 | 240,598 | 10 |
| 1870s | 1,209 | -90,735 | 97,041 | 10 |
| 1880s | 9,615 | -107,436 | 77,744 | 10 |
| 1890s | 14,801 | -197,712 | 152,054 | 10 |
| 1900s | 106,320 | -49,016 | 296,826 | 10 |
| 1910s | 68,292 | -1.21 million | 507,007 | 10 |
| 1920s | -182,730 | -2.12 million | 942,102 | 10 |
| 1930s | -15,582 | -338,567 | 438,258 | 10 |
| 1940s | -36,544 | -206,902 | 264,128 | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.53 million | -2.33 million | 8.02 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 157,856 | -1.98 million | 1.99 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 1.44 million | 157,584 | 4.15 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 403,451 | -3.71 million | 1.80 million | 10 |
| 1990s | -1.12 million | -6.21 million | 1.64 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 377,154 | -1.06 million | 2.01 million | 10 |
| 2010s | -577,385 | -3.97 million | 4.78 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 390,664 | -1.21 million | 1.27 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More climate change data for Cuba
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 70.05 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 12,131 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 3,149 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 8,982 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 11.88 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 320.8 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,054 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 500.27 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,554 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.89 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is absolute change co2 in Cuba?
- Absolute change co2 in Cuba was 969,964 in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest absolute change co2 recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 8.02 million in 1957.
- What is the lowest absolute change co2 recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was -6.21 million in 1992.
- How does Cuba rank for absolute change co2?
- Cuba ranks 38th out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
- Is absolute change co2 rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 283.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Absolute change co2. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 168 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).