Absolute change co2 in Ecuador
Ecuador: Absolute change co2 was 1.38 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
1.38 million
Change on year
down 45.5%
World rank
33rd
of 215 countries
All-time high
9.20 million
in 1995
All-time low
-9.78 million
in 1994
Years of data
132
1893–2024
Absolute change co2 in Ecuador, 1893–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for absolute change co2 in Ecuador is 1.38 million, measured in 2024.
The figure is down 45.5% on the previous year and down 66.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, absolute change co2 in Ecuador peaked at 9.20 million in 1995 and was at its lowest, -9.78 million, in 1994.
Ecuador ranks 33rd of 215 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Absolute change co2 in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1893 | -77 | — |
| 1894 | 5 | -106.5% |
| 1895 | 3,390 | +67700.0% |
| 1896 | -3,400 | -200.3% |
| 1897 | 807 | -123.7% |
| 1898 | -810 | -200.4% |
| 1899 | 1,967 | -342.8% |
| 1900 | -1,964 | -199.8% |
| 1901 | 15 | -100.8% |
| 1902 | 31 | +106.7% |
| 1903 | 2,518 | +8022.6% |
| 1904 | 1,729 | -31.3% |
| 1905 | 32,801 | +1797.1% |
| 1906 | -24,278 | -174.0% |
| 1907 | -12,327 | -49.2% |
| 1908 | 7,326 | -159.4% |
| 1909 | 27,787 | +279.3% |
| 1910 | 20,408 | -26.6% |
| 1911 | -4,779 | -123.4% |
| 1912 | -4,378 | -8.4% |
| 1913 | 6,400 | -246.2% |
| 1914 | -23,848 | -472.6% |
| 1915 | -4,932 | -79.3% |
| 1916 | 25,191 | -610.8% |
| 1917 | 12,527 | -50.3% |
| 1918 | -30,724 | -345.3% |
| 1919 | 2,016 | -106.6% |
| 1920 | 5,753 | +185.4% |
| 1921 | -2,434 | -142.3% |
| 1922 | -351 | -85.6% |
| 1923 | 5,734 | -1733.6% |
| 1924 | 9,949 | +73.5% |
| 1925 | 20,370 | +104.7% |
| 1926 | 40,337 | +98.0% |
| 1927 | 122,516 | +203.7% |
| 1928 | 238,920 | +95.0% |
| 1929 | 127,083 | -46.8% |
| 1930 | 76,790 | -39.6% |
| 1931 | 88,772 | +15.6% |
| 1932 | -54,960 | -161.9% |
| 1933 | 14,656 | -126.7% |
| 1934 | 7,328 | -50.0% |
| 1935 | 51,237 | +599.2% |
| 1936 | 91,659 | +78.9% |
| 1937 | 98,928 | +7.9% |
| 1938 | 54,960 | -44.4% |
| 1939 | 39,478 | -28.2% |
| 1940 | 18,320 | -53.6% |
| 1941 | -359,072 | -2060.0% |
| 1942 | 322,402 | -189.8% |
| 1943 | 3,634 | -98.9% |
| 1944 | 271,107 | +7360.3% |
| 1945 | -98,928 | -136.5% |
| 1946 | -124,576 | +25.9% |
| 1947 | 54,989 | -144.1% |
| 1948 | 128,595 | +133.9% |
| 1949 | 15,361 | -88.1% |
| 1950 | -561,771 | -3757.1% |
| 1951 | -36,729 | -93.5% |
| 1952 | 191,265 | -620.7% |
| 1953 | -74,046 | -138.7% |
| 1954 | 142,484 | -292.4% |
| 1955 | 234,288 | +64.4% |
| 1956 | 98,898 | -57.8% |
| 1957 | -164,880 | -266.7% |
| 1958 | 190,498 | -215.5% |
| 1959 | -29,282 | -115.4% |
| 1960 | 468,814 | -1701.0% |
| 1961 | -117,337 | -125.0% |
| 1962 | -80,579 | -31.3% |
| 1963 | 230,654 | -386.2% |
| 1964 | 347,961 | +50.9% |
| 1965 | 131,756 | -62.1% |
| 1966 | 142,687 | +8.3% |
| 1967 | 172,149 | +20.6% |
| 1968 | 523,774 | +204.3% |
| 1969 | 476,229 | -9.1% |
| 1970 | 689,339 | +44.7% |
| 1971 | -58,772 | -108.5% |
| 1972 | 369,588 | -728.9% |
| 1973 | 666,848 | +80.4% |
| 1974 | 827,676 | +24.1% |
| 1975 | 1.27 million | +53.6% |
| 1976 | 746,467 | -41.3% |
| 1977 | -627,582 | -184.1% |
| 1978 | 2.94 million | -567.8% |
| 1979 | 1.74 million | -40.9% |
| 1980 | 1.27 million | -26.9% |
| 1981 | 3.25 million | +155.6% |
| 1982 | 2.59 million | -20.3% |
| 1983 | 267,792 | -89.6% |
| 1984 | 1.69 million | +531.9% |
| 1985 | -1.83 million | -208.2% |
| 1986 | -4.16 million | +126.9% |
| 1987 | -167,240 | -96.0% |
| 1988 | 2.15 million | -1385.5% |
| 1989 | 2.99 million | +39.0% |
| 1990 | -3.69 million | -223.6% |
| 1991 | -302,274 | -91.8% |
| 1992 | 5.80 million | -2018.5% |
| 1993 | 2.12 million | -63.4% |
| 1994 | -9.78 million | -560.6% |
| 1995 | 9.20 million | -194.0% |
| 1996 | 1.80 million | -80.4% |
| 1997 | -5.88 million | -425.8% |
| 1998 | 3.66 million | -162.2% |
| 1999 | -1.12 million | -130.6% |
| 2000 | -1.05 million | -6.5% |
| 2001 | 2.49 million | -337.4% |
| 2002 | 1.43 million | -42.7% |
| 2003 | 2.25 million | +57.9% |
| 2004 | 2.20 million | -2.4% |
| 2005 | 1.34 million | -39.0% |
| 2006 | -870,678 | -164.9% |
| 2007 | 4.61 million | -629.7% |
| 2008 | -3.90 million | -184.7% |
| 2009 | 3.33 million | -185.2% |
| 2010 | 2.65 million | -20.2% |
| 2011 | 2.01 million | -24.3% |
| 2012 | -987,604 | -149.1% |
| 2013 | 2.19 million | -322.0% |
| 2014 | 4.07 million | +85.9% |
| 2015 | -2.46 million | -160.4% |
| 2016 | -1.92 million | -21.9% |
| 2017 | -178,644 | -90.7% |
| 2018 | -744,680 | +316.9% |
| 2019 | 1.63 million | -319.1% |
| 2020 | -7.61 million | -566.4% |
| 2021 | 5.71 million | -175.1% |
| 2022 | 3.88 million | -32.1% |
| 2023 | 2.53 million | -34.7% |
| 2024 | 1.38 million | -45.5% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's 1.38 million is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 98,432, 14.0× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Ecuador's 1.38 million is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 109,750, 12.6× the median. (38 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Absolute change co2 in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1895 | +67700.0% | 5 | 3,390 |
| 1903 | +8022.6% | 31 | 2,518 |
| 1944 | +7360.3% | 3,634 | 271,107 |
| 1950 | -3757.1% | 15,361 | -561,771 |
| 1941 | -2060.0% | 18,320 | -359,072 |
| 1992 | +2018.5% | -302,274 | 5.80 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 268.86 | -3,400 | 3,390 | 7 |
| 1900s | 3,364 | -24,278 | 32,801 | 10 |
| 1910s | -211.9 | -30,724 | 25,191 | 10 |
| 1920s | 56,788 | -2,434 | 238,920 | 10 |
| 1930s | 46,885 | -54,960 | 98,928 | 10 |
| 1940s | 23,183 | -359,072 | 322,402 | 10 |
| 1950s | -927.5 | -561,771 | 234,288 | 10 |
| 1960s | 229,611 | -117,337 | 523,774 | 10 |
| 1970s | 855,715 | -627,582 | 2.94 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 804,772 | -4.16 million | 3.25 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 180,311 | -9.78 million | 9.20 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.18 million | -3.90 million | 4.61 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 626,794 | -2.46 million | 4.07 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.18 million | -7.61 million | 5.71 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More climate change data for Ecuador
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 218.44 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 19,195 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,758 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 14,437 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 17.95 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 515.62 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 3,911 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,488 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,423 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 5.62 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is absolute change co2 in Ecuador?
- Absolute change co2 in Ecuador was 1.38 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest absolute change co2 recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 9.20 million in 1995.
- What is the lowest absolute change co2 recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was -9.78 million in 1994.
- How does Ecuador rank for absolute change co2?
- Ecuador ranks 33rd out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
- Is absolute change co2 rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 66.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Absolute change co2. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 132 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).