Absolute change co2 in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Absolute change co2 was 831,040 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
831,040
Change on year
down 93.0%
World rank
42nd
of 215 countries
All-time high
45.60 million
in 2014
All-time low
-36.89 million
in 2021
Years of data
169
1831–2024
Absolute change co2 in Kazakhstan, 1831–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for absolute change co2 in Kazakhstan is 831,040, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 93.0% on the previous year and down 98.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, absolute change co2 in Kazakhstan peaked at 45.60 million in 2014 and was at its lowest, -36.89 million, in 2021.
That places Kazakhstan 42nd out of 215 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Absolute change co2 in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1831 | 243 | — |
| 1832 | -486 | -300.0% |
| 1833 | 243 | -150.0% |
| 1859 | 1,945 | +700.4% |
| 1860 | 10,942 | +462.6% |
| 1861 | 12,157 | +11.1% |
| 1862 | -5,592 | -146.0% |
| 1863 | 2,431 | -143.5% |
| 1864 | 6,565 | +170.1% |
| 1865 | -2,675 | -140.7% |
| 1866 | 124,977 | -4772.0% |
| 1867 | 26,989 | -78.4% |
| 1868 | -35,256 | -230.6% |
| 1869 | 62,245 | -276.6% |
| 1870 | 20,181 | -67.6% |
| 1871 | 89,963 | +345.8% |
| 1872 | 9,240 | -89.7% |
| 1873 | -21,883 | -336.8% |
| 1874 | 71,484 | -426.7% |
| 1875 | 61,273 | -14.3% |
| 1876 | 112,819 | +84.1% |
| 1877 | 11,914 | -89.4% |
| 1878 | 181,629 | +1424.5% |
| 1879 | 20,181 | -88.9% |
| 1880 | 137,377 | +580.7% |
| 1881 | 49,602 | -63.9% |
| 1882 | 52,276 | +5.4% |
| 1883 | 142,726 | +173.0% |
| 1884 | 17,992 | -87.4% |
| 1885 | 106,498 | +491.9% |
| 1886 | 33,310 | -68.7% |
| 1887 | 77,564 | +132.9% |
| 1888 | 60,786 | -21.6% |
| 1889 | 117,682 | +93.6% |
| 1890 | 210,563 | +78.9% |
| 1891 | 181,872 | -13.6% |
| 1892 | 115,980 | -36.2% |
| 1893 | 361,070 | +211.3% |
| 1894 | 45,468 | -87.4% |
| 1895 | 373,227 | +720.9% |
| 1896 | 51,790 | -86.1% |
| 1897 | 457,598 | +783.6% |
| 1898 | 411,644 | -10.0% |
| 1899 | 608,105 | +47.7% |
| 1900 | 585,250 | -3.8% |
| 1901 | 133,000 | -77.3% |
| 1902 | -175,064 | -231.6% |
| 1903 | -107,957 | -38.3% |
| 1904 | 545,131 | -605.0% |
| 1905 | -578,442 | -206.1% |
| 1906 | 676,186 | -216.9% |
| 1907 | 658,679 | -2.6% |
| 1908 | 37,687 | -94.3% |
| 1909 | 343,807 | +812.3% |
| 1910 | -125,949 | -136.6% |
| 1911 | 235,364 | -286.9% |
| 1912 | 880,913 | +274.3% |
| 1913 | 648,710 | -26.4% |
| 1914 | -795,812 | -222.7% |
| 1915 | -605,188 | -24.0% |
| 1916 | 445,198 | -173.6% |
| 1917 | -574,307 | -229.0% |
| 1918 | -3.99 million | +594.5% |
| 1919 | -385,870 | -90.3% |
| 1920 | -199,136 | -48.4% |
| 1921 | 174,092 | -187.4% |
| 1922 | 490,666 | +181.8% |
| 1923 | 285,209 | -41.9% |
| 1924 | 576,252 | +102.0% |
| 1925 | -46,683 | -108.1% |
| 1926 | 1.59 million | -3504.2% |
| 1927 | 1.25 million | -21.5% |
| 1928 | 726,273 | -41.8% |
| 1929 | 548,197 | -24.5% |
| 1930 | 2.74 million | +400.5% |
| 1931 | 2.09 million | -23.8% |
| 1932 | 1.58 million | -24.2% |
| 1933 | 1.65 million | +3.9% |
| 1934 | 3.30 million | +100.3% |
| 1935 | 2.51 million | -23.7% |
| 1936 | 3.17 million | +25.9% |
| 1937 | 551,002 | -82.6% |
| 1938 | 1.40 million | +153.9% |
| 1939 | 326,216 | -76.7% |
| 1940 | 5.36 million | +1541.8% |
| 1941 | -3.92 million | -173.2% |
| 1942 | -12.99 million | +231.5% |
| 1943 | 672,781 | -105.2% |
| 1944 | 7.24 million | +976.2% |
| 1945 | 1.39 million | -80.8% |
| 1946 | 3.08 million | +121.4% |
| 1947 | 5.68 million | +84.7% |
| 1948 | 2.16 million | -62.0% |
| 1949 | 4.88 million | +125.7% |
| 1950 | 4.66 million | -4.4% |
| 1951 | 3.80 million | -18.6% |
| 1952 | 3.48 million | -8.4% |
| 1953 | 3.05 million | -12.3% |
| 1954 | 5.13 million | +68.2% |
| 1955 | 8.13 million | +58.4% |
| 1956 | 6.63 million | -18.5% |
| 1957 | 7.12 million | +7.5% |
| 1958 | 5.57 million | -21.7% |
| 1959 | 4.55 million | -18.3% |
| 1960 | 3.84 million | -15.6% |
| 1961 | 3.02 million | -21.3% |
| 1962 | 4.93 million | +63.0% |
| 1963 | 7.53 million | +52.9% |
| 1964 | 7.08 million | -6.0% |
| 1965 | 7.24 million | +2.2% |
| 1966 | 7.08 million | -2.2% |
| 1967 | 6.06 million | -14.4% |
| 1968 | 3.88 million | -36.0% |
| 1969 | 5.90 million | +52.2% |
| 1970 | 7.77 million | +31.7% |
| 1971 | 9.47 million | +21.9% |
| 1972 | 8.57 million | -9.6% |
| 1973 | 7.27 million | -15.1% |
| 1974 | 6.80 million | -6.4% |
| 1975 | 9.54 million | +40.2% |
| 1976 | 7.46 million | -21.8% |
| 1977 | 6.82 million | -8.6% |
| 1978 | 7.11 million | +4.3% |
| 1979 | 1.67 million | -76.6% |
| 1980 | 8.61 million | +416.9% |
| 1981 | -4.69 million | -154.4% |
| 1982 | 4.16 million | -188.9% |
| 1983 | 3.05 million | -26.8% |
| 1984 | 1.87 million | -38.6% |
| 1985 | 18.49 million | +887.9% |
| 1986 | 4.98 million | -73.0% |
| 1987 | -1.45 million | -129.1% |
| 1988 | 17.05 million | -1276.8% |
| 1989 | -9.13 million | -153.5% |
| 1990 | 2.80 million | -130.7% |
| 1991 | -6.98 million | -349.5% |
| 1992 | -26.90 million | +285.1% |
| 1993 | -25.96 million | -3.5% |
| 1994 | -32.89 million | +26.7% |
| 1995 | -6.20 million | -81.1% |
| 1996 | -13.75 million | +121.7% |
| 1997 | -7.42 million | -46.0% |
| 1998 | -1.67 million | -77.5% |
| 1999 | -26.86 million | +1507.2% |
| 2000 | 23.44 million | -187.2% |
| 2001 | -4.16 million | -117.8% |
| 2002 | 18.73 million | -550.2% |
| 2003 | 18.25 million | -2.6% |
| 2004 | 10.45 million | -42.7% |
| 2005 | 12.97 million | +24.1% |
| 2006 | 21.18 million | +63.3% |
| 2007 | 6.08 million | -71.3% |
| 2008 | 389,984 | -93.6% |
| 2009 | -2.91 million | -847.0% |
| 2010 | 24.90 million | -954.9% |
| 2011 | -9.94 million | -139.9% |
| 2012 | 7.11 million | -171.5% |
| 2013 | 8.27 million | +16.4% |
| 2014 | 45.60 million | +451.5% |
| 2015 | 3.91 million | -91.4% |
| 2016 | -1.31 million | -133.6% |
| 2017 | 15.98 million | -1316.7% |
| 2018 | 11.85 million | -25.8% |
| 2019 | -33.53 million | -382.9% |
| 2020 | -14.25 million | -57.5% |
| 2021 | -36.89 million | +158.8% |
| 2022 | 29.44 million | -179.8% |
| 2023 | 11.83 million | -59.8% |
| 2024 | 831,040 | -93.0% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 831,040 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 98,432, 8.4× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 831,040 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is -1,028. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Absolute change co2 in Kazakhstan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1866 | +4772.0% | -2,675 | 124,977 |
| 1926 | +3504.2% | -46,683 | 1.59 million |
| 1940 | +1541.8% | 326,216 | 5.36 million |
| 1999 | -1507.2% | -1.67 million | -26.86 million |
| 1878 | +1424.5% | 11,914 | 181,629 |
| 2017 | +1316.7% | -1.31 million | 15.98 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0 | -486 | 243 | 3 |
| 1850s | 1,945 | 1,945 | 1,945 | 1 |
| 1860s | 20,278 | -35,256 | 124,977 | 10 |
| 1870s | 55,680 | -21,883 | 181,629 | 10 |
| 1880s | 79,581 | 17,992 | 142,726 | 10 |
| 1890s | 281,732 | 45,468 | 608,105 | 10 |
| 1900s | 211,828 | -578,442 | 676,186 | 10 |
| 1910s | -426,524 | -3.99 million | 880,913 | 10 |
| 1920s | 539,188 | -199,136 | 1.59 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 1.93 million | 326,216 | 3.30 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 1.35 million | -12.99 million | 7.24 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 5.21 million | 3.05 million | 8.13 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 5.66 million | 3.02 million | 7.53 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 7.25 million | 1.67 million | 9.54 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 4.29 million | -9.13 million | 18.49 million | 10 |
| 1990s | -14.58 million | -32.89 million | 2.80 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 10.44 million | -4.16 million | 23.44 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 7.29 million | -33.53 million | 45.60 million | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.81 million | -36.89 million | 29.44 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More climate change data for Kazakhstan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 52.07 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 21,403 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,230 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 16,173 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 577.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,395 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 798.63 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.02 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is absolute change co2 in Kazakhstan?
- Absolute change co2 in Kazakhstan was 831,040 in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest absolute change co2 recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 45.60 million in 2014.
- What is the lowest absolute change co2 recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was -36.89 million in 2021.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for absolute change co2?
- Kazakhstan ranks 42nd out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
- Is absolute change co2 rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 98.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Absolute change co2. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 169 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).