Absolute change co2 in Norway
Norway: Absolute change co2 was -1.69 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
-1.69 million
Change on year
up 14.2%
World rank
194th
of 215 countries
All-time high
5.78 million
in 1970
All-time low
-6.01 million
in 1940
Years of data
274
1751–2024
Absolute change co2 in Norway, 1751–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, absolute change co2 in Norway stood at -1.69 million.
The figure is up 14.2% on the previous year and down 486.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, absolute change co2 in Norway peaked at 5.78 million in 1970 and was at its lowest, -6.01 million, in 1940.
Norway ranks 194th of 215 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Absolute change co2 in Norway, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1751 | 0 | — |
| 1752 | 0 | — |
| 1753 | 0 | — |
| 1754 | 0 | — |
| 1755 | 0 | — |
| 1756 | 0 | — |
| 1757 | 0 | — |
| 1758 | 0 | — |
| 1759 | 0 | — |
| 1760 | 0 | — |
| 1761 | 0 | — |
| 1762 | 0 | — |
| 1763 | 0 | — |
| 1764 | 0 | — |
| 1765 | 0 | — |
| 1766 | 0 | — |
| 1767 | 0 | — |
| 1768 | 0 | — |
| 1769 | 0 | — |
| 1770 | 0 | — |
| 1771 | 0 | — |
| 1772 | 0 | — |
| 1773 | 0 | — |
| 1774 | 0 | — |
| 1775 | 0 | — |
| 1776 | 0 | — |
| 1777 | 0 | — |
| 1778 | 0 | — |
| 1779 | 0 | — |
| 1780 | 0 | — |
| 1781 | 0 | — |
| 1782 | 0 | — |
| 1783 | 0 | — |
| 1784 | 0 | — |
| 1785 | 0 | — |
| 1786 | 0 | — |
| 1787 | 0 | — |
| 1788 | 0 | — |
| 1789 | 0 | — |
| 1790 | 0 | — |
| 1791 | 0 | — |
| 1792 | 0 | — |
| 1793 | 0 | — |
| 1794 | 0 | — |
| 1795 | 0 | — |
| 1796 | 0 | — |
| 1797 | 0 | — |
| 1798 | 0 | — |
| 1799 | 0 | — |
| 1800 | 0 | — |
| 1801 | 0 | — |
| 1802 | 0 | — |
| 1803 | 0 | — |
| 1804 | 0 | — |
| 1805 | 0 | — |
| 1806 | 0 | — |
| 1807 | 0 | — |
| 1808 | 0 | — |
| 1809 | 0 | — |
| 1810 | 0 | — |
| 1811 | 0 | — |
| 1812 | 0 | — |
| 1813 | 0 | — |
| 1814 | 0 | — |
| 1815 | 0 | — |
| 1816 | 0 | — |
| 1817 | 0 | — |
| 1818 | 0 | — |
| 1819 | 0 | — |
| 1820 | 0 | — |
| 1821 | 0 | — |
| 1822 | 0 | — |
| 1823 | 0 | — |
| 1824 | 0 | — |
| 1825 | 0 | — |
| 1826 | 0 | — |
| 1827 | 0 | — |
| 1828 | 0 | — |
| 1829 | 10,992 | — |
| 1830 | -3,664 | -133.3% |
| 1831 | -3,664 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -3,664 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1834 | 0 | — |
| 1835 | 14,656 | — |
| 1836 | 3,664 | -75.0% |
| 1837 | 7,328 | +100.0% |
| 1838 | 25,648 | +250.0% |
| 1839 | -10,992 | -142.9% |
| 1840 | 3,664 | -133.3% |
| 1841 | 14,656 | +300.0% |
| 1842 | 14,656 | +0.0% |
| 1843 | -10,992 | -175.0% |
| 1844 | 3,664 | -133.3% |
| 1845 | 32,976 | +800.0% |
| 1846 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1847 | 3,664 | — |
| 1848 | 29,312 | +700.0% |
| 1849 | -25,648 | -187.5% |
| 1850 | 32,976 | -228.6% |
| 1851 | 10,992 | -66.7% |
| 1852 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1853 | 14,656 | — |
| 1854 | 69,616 | +375.0% |
| 1855 | 21,984 | -68.4% |
| 1856 | 47,632 | +116.7% |
| 1857 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1858 | -36,640 | — |
| 1859 | 58,624 | -260.0% |
| 1860 | 7,328 | -87.5% |
| 1861 | 95,264 | +1200.0% |
| 1862 | -58,624 | -161.5% |
| 1863 | -7,328 | -87.5% |
| 1864 | 117,248 | -1700.0% |
| 1865 | -7,328 | -106.2% |
| 1866 | 47,632 | -750.0% |
| 1867 | 98,928 | +107.7% |
| 1868 | 14,656 | -85.2% |
| 1869 | -80,608 | -650.0% |
| 1870 | 76,944 | -195.5% |
| 1871 | -18,320 | -123.8% |
| 1872 | 43,968 | -340.0% |
| 1873 | 3,664 | -91.7% |
| 1874 | 157,552 | +4200.0% |
| 1875 | 208,848 | +32.6% |
| 1876 | -120,912 | -157.9% |
| 1877 | 315,104 | -360.6% |
| 1878 | -131,904 | -141.9% |
| 1879 | 54,960 | -141.7% |
| 1880 | 106,256 | +93.3% |
| 1881 | 43,968 | -58.6% |
| 1882 | 120,912 | +175.0% |
| 1883 | 109,920 | -9.1% |
| 1884 | 36,640 | -66.7% |
| 1885 | 223,504 | +510.0% |
| 1886 | -40,304 | -118.0% |
| 1887 | -62,288 | +54.5% |
| 1888 | 263,808 | -523.5% |
| 1889 | 274,800 | +4.2% |
| 1890 | -142,896 | -152.0% |
| 1891 | 337,088 | -335.9% |
| 1892 | 51,296 | -84.8% |
| 1893 | -3,664 | -107.1% |
| 1894 | 443,344 | -12200.0% |
| 1895 | 153,888 | -65.3% |
| 1896 | 65,952 | -57.1% |
| 1897 | 260,144 | +294.4% |
| 1898 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1899 | 663,184 | — |
| 1900 | 106,256 | -84.0% |
| 1901 | -260,144 | -344.8% |
| 1902 | 348,080 | -233.8% |
| 1903 | -3,664 | -101.1% |
| 1904 | -80,608 | +2100.0% |
| 1905 | -10,992 | -86.4% |
| 1906 | 76,944 | -800.0% |
| 1907 | 556,928 | +623.8% |
| 1908 | 934,320 | +67.8% |
| 1909 | 47,632 | -94.9% |
| 1910 | 175,872 | +269.2% |
| 1911 | 139,232 | -20.8% |
| 1912 | 798,752 | +473.7% |
| 1913 | 40,304 | -95.0% |
| 1914 | 791,424 | +1863.6% |
| 1915 | 740,128 | -6.5% |
| 1916 | -553,264 | -174.8% |
| 1917 | -4.40 million | +695.4% |
| 1918 | 956,304 | -121.7% |
| 1919 | 839,056 | -12.3% |
| 1920 | 10,992 | -98.7% |
| 1921 | -1.93 million | -17633.3% |
| 1922 | 3.11 million | -261.2% |
| 1923 | 311,440 | -90.0% |
| 1924 | 934,320 | +200.0% |
| 1925 | -131,904 | -114.1% |
| 1926 | -1.23 million | +836.1% |
| 1927 | 2.31 million | -286.8% |
| 1928 | -214,094 | -109.3% |
| 1929 | 1.07 million | -598.4% |
| 1930 | -793,978 | -174.4% |
| 1931 | -640,339 | -19.4% |
| 1932 | 557,129 | -187.0% |
| 1933 | 535,810 | -3.8% |
| 1934 | 305,850 | -42.9% |
| 1935 | 296,724 | -3.0% |
| 1936 | 659,372 | +122.2% |
| 1937 | 1.32 million | +100.0% |
| 1938 | -1.28 million | -197.2% |
| 1939 | 2.04 million | -258.8% |
| 1940 | -6.01 million | -394.8% |
| 1941 | -1.70 million | -71.8% |
| 1942 | -187,103 | -89.0% |
| 1943 | 817,341 | -536.8% |
| 1944 | -564,315 | -169.0% |
| 1945 | -867,626 | +53.7% |
| 1946 | 3.06 million | -452.9% |
| 1947 | 3.55 million | +16.1% |
| 1948 | 355,171 | -90.0% |
| 1949 | -575,516 | -262.0% |
| 1950 | -1.97 million | +243.1% |
| 1951 | 1.04 million | -152.9% |
| 1952 | 208,818 | -80.0% |
| 1953 | 98,718 | -52.7% |
| 1954 | 98,870 | +0.2% |
| 1955 | 1.53 million | +1448.9% |
| 1956 | 538,222 | -64.9% |
| 1957 | -594,044 | -210.4% |
| 1958 | -172,267 | -71.0% |
| 1959 | 622,464 | -461.3% |
| 1960 | 1.28 million | +105.4% |
| 1961 | 248,676 | -80.6% |
| 1962 | 724,908 | +191.5% |
| 1963 | 904,889 | +24.8% |
| 1964 | 1.21 million | +33.2% |
| 1965 | 219,600 | -81.8% |
| 1966 | 3.15 million | +1334.5% |
| 1967 | -235,832 | -107.5% |
| 1968 | 1.81 million | -867.3% |
| 1969 | 1.08 million | -40.3% |
| 1970 | 5.78 million | +435.6% |
| 1971 | -812,694 | -114.0% |
| 1972 | 2.23 million | -374.3% |
| 1973 | 1.10 million | -50.8% |
| 1974 | -2.80 million | -355.4% |
| 1975 | 2.91 million | -203.9% |
| 1976 | 2.73 million | -6.2% |
| 1977 | -22,660 | -100.8% |
| 1978 | -684,994 | +2922.9% |
| 1979 | 2.00 million | -392.1% |
| 1980 | -2.85 million | -242.4% |
| 1981 | 27,664 | -101.0% |
| 1982 | -892,568 | -3326.5% |
| 1983 | 1.04 million | -216.0% |
| 1984 | 1.86 million | +80.0% |
| 1985 | -1.52 million | -181.8% |
| 1986 | 2.50 million | -264.0% |
| 1987 | -1.58 million | -163.1% |
| 1988 | 2.38 million | -251.1% |
| 1989 | -1.44 million | -160.5% |
| 1990 | 861,148 | -159.6% |
| 1991 | -1.54 million | -279.2% |
| 1992 | 936,000 | -160.7% |
| 1993 | 1.55 million | +65.2% |
| 1994 | 1.92 million | +23.9% |
| 1995 | 606,000 | -68.4% |
| 1996 | 3.07 million | +406.8% |
| 1997 | 104,000 | -96.6% |
| 1998 | 194,000 | +86.5% |
| 1999 | 771,000 | +297.4% |
| 2000 | -478,000 | -162.0% |
| 2001 | 1.39 million | -390.4% |
| 2002 | -948,000 | -168.3% |
| 2003 | 1.35 million | -242.2% |
| 2004 | 338,000 | -74.9% |
| 2005 | -978,000 | -389.3% |
| 2006 | 580,000 | -159.3% |
| 2007 | 1.75 million | +201.0% |
| 2008 | -913,000 | -152.3% |
| 2009 | -1.59 million | +74.6% |
| 2010 | 2.56 million | -260.7% |
| 2011 | -884,000 | -134.5% |
| 2012 | -517,000 | -41.5% |
| 2013 | 281,000 | -154.4% |
| 2014 | 436,000 | +55.2% |
| 2015 | 548,000 | +25.7% |
| 2016 | -815,000 | -248.7% |
| 2017 | -511,000 | -37.3% |
| 2018 | 275,000 | -153.8% |
| 2019 | -1.61 million | -684.0% |
| 2020 | -1.59 million | -0.9% |
| 2021 | -217,000 | -86.4% |
| 2022 | -225,000 | +3.7% |
| 2023 | -1.96 million | +772.9% |
| 2024 | -1.69 million | -14.2% |
Norway compared with similar countries
- Norway's -1.69 million is below the median for high income countries, which is 13,739. (74 countries reporting)
- Norway's -1.69 million is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is -1,028, 1639.3× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Absolute change co2 in Norway changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1921 | -17633.3% | 10,992 | -1.93 million |
| 1894 | +12200.0% | -3,664 | 443,344 |
| 1874 | +4200.0% | 3,664 | 157,552 |
| 1982 | -3326.5% | 27,664 | -892,568 |
| 1978 | -2922.9% | -22,660 | -684,994 |
| 1904 | -2100.0% | -3,664 | -80,608 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1750s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| 1760s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1770s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1780s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1790s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1820s | 1,099 | 0 | 10,992 | 10 |
| 1830s | 2,931 | -10,992 | 25,648 | 10 |
| 1840s | 6,595 | -25,648 | 32,976 | 10 |
| 1850s | 21,984 | -36,640 | 69,616 | 10 |
| 1860s | 22,717 | -80,608 | 117,248 | 10 |
| 1870s | 58,990 | -131,904 | 315,104 | 10 |
| 1880s | 107,722 | -62,288 | 274,800 | 10 |
| 1890s | 182,834 | -142,896 | 663,184 | 10 |
| 1900s | 171,475 | -260,144 | 934,320 | 10 |
| 1910s | -47,265 | -4.40 million | 956,304 | 10 |
| 1920s | 422,979 | -1.93 million | 3.11 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 299,404 | -1.28 million | 2.04 million | 10 |
| 1940s | -210,763 | -6.01 million | 3.55 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 140,114 | -1.97 million | 1.53 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 1.04 million | -235,832 | 3.15 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 1.24 million | -2.80 million | 5.78 million | 10 |
| 1980s | -47,732 | -2.85 million | 2.50 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 846,115 | -1.54 million | 3.07 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 48,900 | -1.59 million | 1.75 million | 10 |
| 2010s | -23,200 | -1.61 million | 2.56 million | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.14 million | -1.96 million | -217,000 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Norway
More climate change data for Norway
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 147.21 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 4,074 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 927.05 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3,147 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 3.5 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 112.4 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 904.43 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 902.03 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2.4 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 3.4 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is absolute change co2 in Norway?
- Absolute change co2 in Norway was -1.69 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest absolute change co2 recorded in Norway?
- The highest recorded value was 5.78 million in 1970.
- What is the lowest absolute change co2 recorded in Norway?
- The lowest recorded value was -6.01 million in 1940.
- How does Norway rank for absolute change co2?
- Norway ranks 194th out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
- Is absolute change co2 rising or falling in Norway?
- Over the last ten years it is down 486.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Norway data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Absolute change co2. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 274 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).