Absolute change co2 in Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan: Absolute change co2 was 16.36 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
16.36 million
Change on year
up 334.4%
World rank
7th
of 215 countries
All-time high
16.36 million
in 2024
All-time low
-19.16 million
in 2009
Years of data
169
1831–2024
Absolute change co2 in Uzbekistan, 1831–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, absolute change co2 in Uzbekistan stood at 16.36 million. That is the highest value across all 169 years on record.
That represents a change of up 334.4% on the previous year and up 434.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, absolute change co2 in Uzbekistan peaked at 16.36 million in 2024 and was at its lowest, -19.16 million, in 2009.
That places Uzbekistan 7th out of 215 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Absolute change co2 in Uzbekistan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1831 | 95 | — |
| 1832 | -191 | -301.1% |
| 1833 | 96 | -150.3% |
| 1859 | 763 | +694.8% |
| 1860 | 4,291 | +462.4% |
| 1861 | 4,769 | +11.1% |
| 1862 | -2,194 | -146.0% |
| 1863 | 954 | -143.5% |
| 1864 | 2,575 | +169.9% |
| 1865 | -1,049 | -140.7% |
| 1866 | 49,017 | -4772.7% |
| 1867 | 10,585 | -78.4% |
| 1868 | -13,827 | -230.6% |
| 1869 | 24,413 | -276.6% |
| 1870 | 7,915 | -67.6% |
| 1871 | 35,285 | +345.8% |
| 1872 | 3,624 | -89.7% |
| 1873 | -8,583 | -336.8% |
| 1874 | 28,037 | -426.7% |
| 1875 | 24,032 | -14.3% |
| 1876 | 44,249 | +84.1% |
| 1877 | 4,673 | -89.4% |
| 1878 | 71,237 | +1424.4% |
| 1879 | 7,915 | -88.9% |
| 1880 | 53,881 | +580.7% |
| 1881 | 19,455 | -63.9% |
| 1882 | 20,503 | +5.4% |
| 1883 | 55,979 | +173.0% |
| 1884 | 7,057 | -87.4% |
| 1885 | 41,769 | +491.9% |
| 1886 | 13,065 | -68.7% |
| 1887 | 30,422 | +132.9% |
| 1888 | 23,841 | -21.6% |
| 1889 | 46,156 | +93.6% |
| 1890 | 82,586 | +78.9% |
| 1891 | 71,332 | -13.6% |
| 1892 | 45,489 | -36.2% |
| 1893 | 141,616 | +211.3% |
| 1894 | 17,833 | -87.4% |
| 1895 | 146,385 | +720.9% |
| 1896 | 20,312 | -86.1% |
| 1897 | 179,476 | +783.6% |
| 1898 | 161,452 | -10.0% |
| 1899 | 238,506 | +47.7% |
| 1900 | 229,543 | -3.8% |
| 1901 | 52,164 | -77.3% |
| 1902 | -68,662 | -231.6% |
| 1903 | -42,342 | -38.3% |
| 1904 | 213,807 | -605.0% |
| 1905 | -226,872 | -206.1% |
| 1906 | 265,208 | -216.9% |
| 1907 | 258,342 | -2.6% |
| 1908 | 14,782 | -94.3% |
| 1909 | 134,845 | +812.2% |
| 1910 | -49,399 | -136.6% |
| 1911 | 92,313 | -286.9% |
| 1912 | 345,505 | +274.3% |
| 1913 | 254,433 | -26.4% |
| 1914 | -312,128 | -222.7% |
| 1915 | -237,362 | -24.0% |
| 1916 | 174,612 | -173.6% |
| 1917 | -225,251 | -229.0% |
| 1918 | -1.56 million | +594.5% |
| 1919 | -151,343 | -90.3% |
| 1920 | -78,104 | -48.4% |
| 1921 | 68,281 | -187.4% |
| 1922 | 192,446 | +181.8% |
| 1923 | 111,862 | -41.9% |
| 1924 | 226,014 | +102.0% |
| 1925 | -18,310 | -108.1% |
| 1926 | 623,301 | -3504.2% |
| 1927 | 489,411 | -21.5% |
| 1928 | 187,775 | -61.6% |
| 1929 | 204,524 | +8.9% |
| 1930 | 1.08 million | +426.1% |
| 1931 | 813,570 | -24.4% |
| 1932 | 594,179 | -27.0% |
| 1933 | 664,603 | +11.9% |
| 1934 | 1.25 million | +88.0% |
| 1935 | 931,997 | -25.4% |
| 1936 | 1.17 million | +25.2% |
| 1937 | 239,433 | -79.5% |
| 1938 | 536,533 | +124.1% |
| 1939 | 126,341 | -76.5% |
| 1940 | 2.07 million | +1535.3% |
| 1941 | -1.53 million | -174.0% |
| 1942 | -4.79 million | +212.9% |
| 1943 | 263,874 | -105.5% |
| 1944 | 2.84 million | +976.2% |
| 1945 | 433,147 | -84.7% |
| 1946 | 1.11 million | +157.0% |
| 1947 | 2.15 million | +92.9% |
| 1948 | 756,636 | -64.8% |
| 1949 | 1.84 million | +142.7% |
| 1950 | 1.71 million | -7.1% |
| 1951 | 1.39 million | -18.6% |
| 1952 | 1.29 million | -6.9% |
| 1953 | 1.12 million | -12.9% |
| 1954 | 1.87 million | +66.5% |
| 1955 | 3.04 million | +62.5% |
| 1956 | 2.57 million | -15.7% |
| 1957 | 2.73 million | +6.6% |
| 1958 | 2.18 million | -20.4% |
| 1959 | 1.73 million | -20.5% |
| 1960 | 1.48 million | -14.5% |
| 1961 | 1.27 million | -14.2% |
| 1962 | 2.01 million | +58.3% |
| 1963 | 3.03 million | +51.0% |
| 1964 | 2.86 million | -5.6% |
| 1965 | 2.85 million | -0.4% |
| 1966 | 2.77 million | -2.9% |
| 1967 | 2.44 million | -11.8% |
| 1968 | 1.62 million | -33.7% |
| 1969 | 2.37 million | +46.4% |
| 1970 | 2.86 million | +20.6% |
| 1971 | 3.86 million | +35.1% |
| 1972 | 3.37 million | -12.7% |
| 1973 | 2.91 million | -13.8% |
| 1974 | 2.74 million | -5.8% |
| 1975 | 3.79 million | +38.6% |
| 1976 | 2.98 million | -21.4% |
| 1977 | 2.72 million | -8.8% |
| 1978 | 2.86 million | +5.2% |
| 1979 | 688,800 | -75.9% |
| 1980 | 3.33 million | +382.7% |
| 1981 | -1.60 million | -148.0% |
| 1982 | 1.68 million | -205.5% |
| 1983 | 1.29 million | -23.1% |
| 1984 | 845,472 | -34.7% |
| 1985 | 7.18 million | +748.7% |
| 1986 | -4.04 million | -156.4% |
| 1987 | 2.45 million | -160.5% |
| 1988 | 3.42 million | +39.8% |
| 1989 | 3.02 million | -11.8% |
| 1990 | -1.00 million | -133.2% |
| 1991 | -799,376 | -20.3% |
| 1992 | 8.67 million | -1184.2% |
| 1993 | 4.63 million | -46.6% |
| 1994 | -5.83 million | -226.0% |
| 1995 | -4.98 million | -14.6% |
| 1996 | 3.38 million | -167.9% |
| 1997 | 840,152 | -75.2% |
| 1998 | 11.95 million | +1322.0% |
| 1999 | 2.61 million | -78.1% |
| 2000 | -109,216 | -104.2% |
| 2001 | 2.74 million | -2612.5% |
| 2002 | 6.35 million | +131.6% |
| 2003 | -2.28 million | -135.9% |
| 2004 | -1.20 million | -47.5% |
| 2005 | -7.50 million | +526.6% |
| 2006 | 3.30 million | -144.0% |
| 2007 | -1.08 million | -132.6% |
| 2008 | 4.56 million | -524.1% |
| 2009 | -19.16 million | -519.7% |
| 2010 | -1.56 million | -91.8% |
| 2011 | 9.09 million | -681.9% |
| 2012 | 2.11 million | -76.8% |
| 2013 | -6.47 million | -407.0% |
| 2014 | -4.90 million | -24.2% |
| 2015 | -4.12 million | -15.9% |
| 2016 | 6.46 million | -256.8% |
| 2017 | -954,464 | -114.8% |
| 2018 | -6.55 million | +586.5% |
| 2019 | 5.62 million | -185.7% |
| 2020 | 191,616 | -96.6% |
| 2021 | 15.02 million | +7740.1% |
| 2022 | -4.06 million | -127.0% |
| 2023 | 3.77 million | -192.9% |
| 2024 | 16.36 million | +334.4% |
Uzbekistan compared with similar countries
- Uzbekistan's 16.36 million is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 105,942, 154.4× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Uzbekistan's 16.36 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is -1,028. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Absolute change co2 in Uzbekistan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | +7740.1% | 191,616 | 15.02 million |
| 1866 | +4772.7% | -1,049 | 49,017 |
| 1926 | +3504.2% | -18,310 | 623,301 |
| 2001 | +2612.5% | -109,216 | 2.74 million |
| 1940 | +1535.3% | 126,341 | 2.07 million |
| 1878 | +1424.4% | 4,673 | 71,237 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0 | -191 | 96 | 3 |
| 1850s | 763 | 763 | 763 | 1 |
| 1860s | 7,953 | -13,827 | 49,017 | 10 |
| 1870s | 21,838 | -8,583 | 71,237 | 10 |
| 1880s | 31,213 | 7,057 | 55,979 | 10 |
| 1890s | 110,499 | 17,833 | 238,506 | 10 |
| 1900s | 83,082 | -226,872 | 265,208 | 10 |
| 1910s | -167,288 | -1.56 million | 345,505 | 10 |
| 1920s | 200,720 | -78,104 | 623,301 | 10 |
| 1930s | 739,904 | 126,341 | 1.25 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 514,170 | -4.79 million | 2.84 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.96 million | 1.12 million | 3.04 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 2.27 million | 1.27 million | 3.03 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 2.88 million | 688,800 | 3.86 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.76 million | -4.04 million | 7.18 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.95 million | -5.83 million | 11.95 million | 10 |
| 2000s | -1.44 million | -19.16 million | 6.35 million | 10 |
| 2010s | -128,255 | -6.55 million | 9.09 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 6.26 million | -4.06 million | 16.36 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Uzbekistan
More climate change data for Uzbekistan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 974.02 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 23,306 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,291 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 18,015 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.97 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 643.38 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 6,140 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,778 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 362.14 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 21.8 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is absolute change co2 in Uzbekistan?
- Absolute change co2 in Uzbekistan was 16.36 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest absolute change co2 recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The highest recorded value was 16.36 million in 2024.
- What is the lowest absolute change co2 recorded in Uzbekistan?
- The lowest recorded value was -19.16 million in 2009.
- How does Uzbekistan rank for absolute change co2?
- Uzbekistan ranks 7th out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
- Is absolute change co2 rising or falling in Uzbekistan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 434.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uzbekistan data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Absolute change co2. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 169 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).