All sectors without LULUCF: Emissions (CO2eq) … unit GDP CH4 in Cuba
Cuba: All sectors without LULUCF: Emissions (CO2eq) … unit GDP CH4 was 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 2020. ◆ Volatile
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per in Cuba, 1990–2020
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kt per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2020, all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per in Cuba stood at 0 kt per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 31 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 7.1% on the previous year and down 49.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per in Cuba peaked at 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 1992 and was at its lowest, 0 kt per US$ of GDP, in 2020.
That places Cuba 103rd out of 198 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
All sectors without LULUCF: Emissions (CO2eq) … unit GDP CH4 in Cuba, year by year
| Year | kt per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1991 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +15.8% |
| 1992 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +10.7% |
| 1993 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -8.3% |
| 1994 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -17.3% |
| 1995 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 1996 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +29.0% |
| 1997 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -2.2% |
| 1998 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 1999 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -11.5% |
| 2000 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -7.2% |
| 2001 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 2002 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -5.6% |
| 2003 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -5.8% |
| 2004 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
| 2005 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -15.2% |
| 2006 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -10.5% |
| 2007 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -9.6% |
| 2008 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 2009 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | +2.8% |
| 2010 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 2011 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -11.9% |
| 2012 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -5.9% |
| 2013 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -4.5% |
| 2014 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -4.9% |
| 2015 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -11.2% |
| 2016 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 2017 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 2018 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -2.6% |
| 2019 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 2020 | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | -7.1% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where All sectors without LULUCF: Emissions (CO2eq) … unit GDP CH4 in Cuba changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | +29.0% | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 1 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More climate change data for Cuba
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 70.05 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 12,131 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 3,149 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 8,982 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 11.88 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 320.8 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,054 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 500.27 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,554 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.89 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per in Cuba?
- All sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per in Cuba was 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 2020, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 1992.
- What is the lowest all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kt per US$ of GDP in 2020.
- How does Cuba rank for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per?
- Cuba ranks 103rd out of 198 countries with data for 2020.
- Is all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from ch4 (ar5), per rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 49.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 31 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.