Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Ecuador
Ecuador: Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate was -2.87 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Ecuador, 1851–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2024, annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Ecuador stood at -2.87 % change on previous year.
The figure is up 98.9% on the previous year and down 100.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Ecuador peaked at 540.35 % change on previous year in 2014 and was at its lowest, -260.68 % change on previous year, in 2023.
Ecuador ranks 128th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1851 | -17.62 % change on previous year | — |
| 1852 | 9.03 % change on previous year | -151.3% |
| 1853 | -2.89 % change on previous year | -132.0% |
| 1854 | 16.5 % change on previous year | -670.8% |
| 1855 | 3.94 % change on previous year | -76.1% |
| 1856 | -20.92 % change on previous year | -630.9% |
| 1857 | 36.46 % change on previous year | -274.3% |
| 1858 | -14.78 % change on previous year | -140.5% |
| 1859 | 17.9 % change on previous year | -221.1% |
| 1860 | 3.06 % change on previous year | -82.9% |
| 1861 | -24.4 % change on previous year | -898.1% |
| 1862 | 72.81 % change on previous year | -398.4% |
| 1863 | -47.69 % change on previous year | -165.5% |
| 1864 | 11.4 % change on previous year | -123.9% |
| 1865 | -7.1 % change on previous year | -162.3% |
| 1866 | 28.68 % change on previous year | -503.7% |
| 1867 | -4.54 % change on previous year | -115.8% |
| 1868 | -26.47 % change on previous year | +483.3% |
| 1869 | 84.24 % change on previous year | -418.3% |
| 1870 | -61.68 % change on previous year | -173.2% |
| 1871 | 168.03 % change on previous year | -372.4% |
| 1872 | 29.92 % change on previous year | -82.2% |
| 1873 | -36.7 % change on previous year | -222.7% |
| 1874 | 17.88 % change on previous year | -148.7% |
| 1875 | -23.94 % change on previous year | -233.9% |
| 1876 | 8.4 % change on previous year | -135.1% |
| 1877 | 102.41 % change on previous year | +1119.6% |
| 1878 | -4.22 % change on previous year | -104.1% |
| 1879 | -48.48 % change on previous year | +1049.4% |
| 1880 | 12.45 % change on previous year | -125.7% |
| 1881 | -27.62 % change on previous year | -321.8% |
| 1882 | 0.4663 % change on previous year | -101.7% |
| 1883 | 4.94 % change on previous year | +959.6% |
| 1884 | 89.54 % change on previous year | +1712.2% |
| 1885 | -35.92 % change on previous year | -140.1% |
| 1886 | 3.47 % change on previous year | -109.7% |
| 1887 | 20.46 % change on previous year | +489.8% |
| 1888 | -19.43 % change on previous year | -194.9% |
| 1889 | -4.37 % change on previous year | -77.5% |
| 1890 | 116.72 % change on previous year | -2771.6% |
| 1891 | -45.79 % change on previous year | -139.2% |
| 1892 | -26.83 % change on previous year | -41.4% |
| 1893 | 4.94 % change on previous year | -118.4% |
| 1894 | 5.8 % change on previous year | +17.4% |
| 1895 | 44.31 % change on previous year | +664.1% |
| 1896 | -39.52 % change on previous year | -189.2% |
| 1897 | 49.43 % change on previous year | -225.1% |
| 1898 | -4.96 % change on previous year | -110.0% |
| 1899 | -4.47 % change on previous year | -9.8% |
| 1900 | 14.2 % change on previous year | -417.7% |
| 1901 | 22 % change on previous year | +54.9% |
| 1902 | 4.39 % change on previous year | -80.1% |
| 1903 | 40.42 % change on previous year | +821.4% |
| 1904 | -23.95 % change on previous year | -159.2% |
| 1905 | 13.01 % change on previous year | -154.3% |
| 1906 | 8.78 % change on previous year | -32.5% |
| 1907 | -40.41 % change on previous year | -560.0% |
| 1908 | 59.38 % change on previous year | -246.9% |
| 1909 | -5.91 % change on previous year | -110.0% |
| 1910 | 9.64 % change on previous year | -263.1% |
| 1911 | -20.47 % change on previous year | -312.4% |
| 1912 | -47.57 % change on previous year | +132.4% |
| 1913 | 87.19 % change on previous year | -283.3% |
| 1914 | -20.35 % change on previous year | -123.3% |
| 1915 | 27.95 % change on previous year | -237.4% |
| 1916 | 13.66 % change on previous year | -51.1% |
| 1917 | -20.56 % change on previous year | -250.5% |
| 1918 | -1.31 % change on previous year | -93.6% |
| 1919 | 23.57 % change on previous year | -1904.3% |
| 1920 | -4.02 % change on previous year | -117.1% |
| 1921 | 13.21 % change on previous year | -428.6% |
| 1922 | -77.56 % change on previous year | -687.1% |
| 1923 | 246.81 % change on previous year | -418.2% |
| 1924 | 0.8394 % change on previous year | -99.7% |
| 1925 | -59.37 % change on previous year | -7173.1% |
| 1926 | 219.3 % change on previous year | -469.4% |
| 1927 | -51.09 % change on previous year | -123.3% |
| 1928 | 100.08 % change on previous year | -295.9% |
| 1929 | -74.3 % change on previous year | -174.2% |
| 1930 | 470.75 % change on previous year | -733.6% |
| 1931 | 46.54 % change on previous year | -90.1% |
| 1932 | 24.23 % change on previous year | -47.9% |
| 1933 | 9.07 % change on previous year | -62.5% |
| 1934 | 31.23 % change on previous year | +244.2% |
| 1935 | -11.55 % change on previous year | -137.0% |
| 1936 | -5.44 % change on previous year | -52.9% |
| 1937 | 17.62 % change on previous year | -423.7% |
| 1938 | -8.53 % change on previous year | -148.4% |
| 1939 | -5.06 % change on previous year | -40.7% |
| 1940 | -10.14 % change on previous year | +100.4% |
| 1941 | -5.04 % change on previous year | -50.3% |
| 1942 | 11.74 % change on previous year | -333.1% |
| 1943 | -8.21 % change on previous year | -170.0% |
| 1944 | -8.19 % change on previous year | -0.2% |
| 1945 | 13.94 % change on previous year | -270.2% |
| 1946 | -13.96 % change on previous year | -200.1% |
| 1947 | 9.69 % change on previous year | -169.4% |
| 1948 | 1.34 % change on previous year | -86.2% |
| 1949 | -3.16 % change on previous year | -336.5% |
| 1950 | 7.67 % change on previous year | -342.7% |
| 1951 | 16 % change on previous year | +108.7% |
| 1952 | -2.13 % change on previous year | -113.3% |
| 1953 | 1.86 % change on previous year | -187.2% |
| 1954 | 9.42 % change on previous year | +406.4% |
| 1955 | 1.06 % change on previous year | -88.8% |
| 1956 | -12.1 % change on previous year | -1242.0% |
| 1957 | 12.68 % change on previous year | -204.9% |
| 1958 | 2.18 % change on previous year | -82.8% |
| 1959 | -2.63 % change on previous year | -220.8% |
| 1960 | 63.92 % change on previous year | -2526.8% |
| 1961 | -46.59 % change on previous year | -172.9% |
| 1962 | -16.89 % change on previous year | -63.7% |
| 1963 | -16.83 % change on previous year | -0.3% |
| 1964 | 0.2991 % change on previous year | -101.8% |
| 1965 | -24.54 % change on previous year | -8304.7% |
| 1966 | -32.64 % change on previous year | +33.0% |
| 1967 | -14.14 % change on previous year | -56.7% |
| 1968 | 139.26 % change on previous year | -1085.0% |
| 1969 | -22.68 % change on previous year | -116.3% |
| 1970 | 27.57 % change on previous year | -221.6% |
| 1971 | -7.46 % change on previous year | -127.1% |
| 1972 | -18.53 % change on previous year | +148.3% |
| 1973 | 73.44 % change on previous year | -496.3% |
| 1974 | 5.26 % change on previous year | -92.8% |
| 1975 | 5.72 % change on previous year | +8.8% |
| 1976 | 22.67 % change on previous year | +296.2% |
| 1977 | -23.77 % change on previous year | -204.9% |
| 1978 | 2.36 % change on previous year | -109.9% |
| 1979 | 28.51 % change on previous year | +1108.6% |
| 1980 | 27.58 % change on previous year | -3.2% |
| 1981 | -11.55 % change on previous year | -141.9% |
| 1982 | -32.53 % change on previous year | +181.6% |
| 1983 | 37.76 % change on previous year | -216.1% |
| 1984 | 24.23 % change on previous year | -35.8% |
| 1985 | -16.84 % change on previous year | -169.5% |
| 1986 | -21.57 % change on previous year | +28.0% |
| 1987 | -26.17 % change on previous year | +21.3% |
| 1988 | -35.68 % change on previous year | +36.3% |
| 1989 | 69.5 % change on previous year | -294.8% |
| 1990 | 26.44 % change on previous year | -62.0% |
| 1991 | -34.27 % change on previous year | -229.6% |
| 1992 | -19.06 % change on previous year | -44.4% |
| 1993 | 72.31 % change on previous year | -479.4% |
| 1994 | -42.03 % change on previous year | -158.1% |
| 1995 | -22.78 % change on previous year | -45.8% |
| 1996 | -16.82 % change on previous year | -26.1% |
| 1997 | 80.83 % change on previous year | -580.5% |
| 1998 | -9.51 % change on previous year | -111.8% |
| 1999 | -11.5 % change on previous year | +21.0% |
| 2000 | -58.01 % change on previous year | +404.3% |
| 2001 | -71.31 % change on previous year | +22.9% |
| 2002 | -149.17 % change on previous year | +109.2% |
| 2004 | -80.99 % change on previous year | -45.7% |
| 2005 | -62.21 % change on previous year | -23.2% |
| 2006 | 7.73 % change on previous year | -112.4% |
| 2007 | 402.73 % change on previous year | +5112.0% |
| 2008 | -29.44 % change on previous year | -107.3% |
| 2009 | -52.15 % change on previous year | +77.1% |
| 2010 | -5.68 % change on previous year | -89.1% |
| 2011 | 294.46 % change on previous year | -5280.5% |
| 2012 | -72.43 % change on previous year | -124.6% |
| 2013 | 25.02 % change on previous year | -134.5% |
| 2014 | 540.35 % change on previous year | +2059.3% |
| 2015 | -74.34 % change on previous year | -113.8% |
| 2016 | -2.56 % change on previous year | -96.6% |
| 2017 | -40.81 % change on previous year | +1494.8% |
| 2018 | 206.09 % change on previous year | -605.0% |
| 2019 | -17.04 % change on previous year | -108.3% |
| 2020 | -51.98 % change on previous year | +205.1% |
| 2021 | -28.82 % change on previous year | -44.6% |
| 2022 | -17.75 % change on previous year | -38.4% |
| 2023 | -260.68 % change on previous year | +1368.9% |
| 2024 | -2.87 % change on previous year | -98.9% |
Ecuador compared with similar countries
- Ecuador's -2.87 % change on previous year is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.3295 % change on previous year. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1965 | -8304.7% | 0.2991 % change on previous year | -24.54 % change on previous year |
| 1925 | -7173.1% | 0.8394 % change on previous year | -59.37 % change on previous year |
| 2011 | +5280.5% | -5.68 % change on previous year | 294.46 % change on previous year |
| 2007 | +5112.0% | 7.73 % change on previous year | 402.73 % change on previous year |
| 1890 | +2771.6% | -4.37 % change on previous year | 116.72 % change on previous year |
| 1960 | +2526.8% | -2.63 % change on previous year | 63.92 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 3.07 % change on previous year | -20.92 % change on previous year | 36.46 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1860s | 9 % change on previous year | -47.69 % change on previous year | 84.24 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1870s | 15.16 % change on previous year | -61.68 % change on previous year | 168.03 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1880s | 4.4 % change on previous year | -35.92 % change on previous year | 89.54 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1890s | 9.96 % change on previous year | -45.79 % change on previous year | 116.72 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1900s | 9.19 % change on previous year | -40.41 % change on previous year | 59.38 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1910s | 5.18 % change on previous year | -47.57 % change on previous year | 87.19 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | 31.39 % change on previous year | -77.56 % change on previous year | 246.81 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | 56.89 % change on previous year | -11.55 % change on previous year | 470.75 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.2 % change on previous year | -13.96 % change on previous year | 13.94 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | 3.4 % change on previous year | -12.1 % change on previous year | 16 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | 2.92 % change on previous year | -46.59 % change on previous year | 139.26 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | 11.58 % change on previous year | -23.77 % change on previous year | 73.44 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.47 % change on previous year | -35.68 % change on previous year | 69.5 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.36 % change on previous year | -42.03 % change on previous year | 80.83 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -10.31 % change on previous year | -149.17 % change on previous year | 402.73 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 2010s | 85.31 % change on previous year | -74.34 % change on previous year | 540.35 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -72.42 % change on previous year | -260.68 % change on previous year | -2.87 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 125 Sierra Leone -2.48 % change on previous year compare
- 126 Andorra -2.52 % change on previous year compare
- 127 Peru -2.65 % change on previous year compare
- 129 Guinea -2.99 % change on previous year compare
- 130 Italy -3.09 % change on previous year compare
- 131 Democratic Republic of Congo -3.14 % change on previous year compare
More climate change data for Ecuador
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 218.44 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 19,195 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,758 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 14,437 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 17.95 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 515.62 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 3,911 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,488 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,423 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 5.62 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Ecuador?
- Annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Ecuador was -2.87 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 540.35 % change on previous year in 2014.
- What is the lowest annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was -260.68 % change on previous year in 2023.
- How does Ecuador rank for annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Ecuador ranks 128th out of 188 countries with data for 2024.
- Is annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 173 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.