Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate was 5.01 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
5.01 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 10.9%
World rank
41st
of 188 countries
All-time high
987.35 % change on previous year
in 1942
All-time low
-720.77 % change on previous year
in 1995
Years of data
173
1851–2024
Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan, 1851–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2024, annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan stood at 5.01 % change on previous year.
The figure is up 10.9% on the previous year and down 93.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan peaked at 987.35 % change on previous year in 1942 and was at its lowest, -720.77 % change on previous year, in 1995.
That places Kazakhstan 41st out of 188 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1851 | 0.4922 % change on previous year | — |
| 1852 | 0.5987 % change on previous year | +21.6% |
| 1853 | 0.2651 % change on previous year | -55.7% |
| 1854 | 0.7119 % change on previous year | +168.5% |
| 1855 | 0.2101 % change on previous year | -70.5% |
| 1856 | 0.2003 % change on previous year | -4.7% |
| 1857 | 0.1524 % change on previous year | -23.9% |
| 1858 | 0.2029 % change on previous year | +33.1% |
| 1859 | 0.0478 % change on previous year | -76.4% |
| 1860 | 0.1194 % change on previous year | +149.9% |
| 1861 | 1.16 % change on previous year | +874.9% |
| 1862 | 0.5059 % change on previous year | -56.6% |
| 1863 | 0.4311 % change on previous year | -14.8% |
| 1864 | 0.641 % change on previous year | +48.7% |
| 1865 | 0.4002 % change on previous year | -37.6% |
| 1866 | -0.1451 % change on previous year | -136.3% |
| 1867 | 0.2806 % change on previous year | -293.4% |
| 1868 | 0.374 % change on previous year | +33.3% |
| 1869 | -0.1674 % change on previous year | -144.7% |
| 1870 | 1.69 % change on previous year | -1112.2% |
| 1871 | 0.3177 % change on previous year | -81.2% |
| 1872 | 0.5116 % change on previous year | +61.0% |
| 1873 | 0.6148 % change on previous year | +20.2% |
| 1874 | 0.4967 % change on previous year | -19.2% |
| 1875 | 0.3922 % change on previous year | -21.0% |
| 1876 | 0.2909 % change on previous year | -25.8% |
| 1877 | 0.3857 % change on previous year | +32.6% |
| 1878 | 0.2846 % change on previous year | -26.2% |
| 1879 | 0.0916 % change on previous year | -67.8% |
| 1880 | 1.01 % change on previous year | +1001.8% |
| 1881 | 0.6783 % change on previous year | -32.8% |
| 1882 | 0.5796 % change on previous year | -14.6% |
| 1883 | 0.079 % change on previous year | -86.4% |
| 1884 | 0.3815 % change on previous year | +383.1% |
| 1885 | 0.2559 % change on previous year | -32.9% |
| 1886 | 0.0717 % change on previous year | -72.0% |
| 1887 | -0.1771 % change on previous year | -346.9% |
| 1888 | 0.4621 % change on previous year | -360.9% |
| 1889 | 0.3324 % change on previous year | -28.1% |
| 1890 | 0.3893 % change on previous year | +17.1% |
| 1891 | 0.9637 % change on previous year | +147.5% |
| 1892 | 0.6317 % change on previous year | -34.5% |
| 1893 | 0.4454 % change on previous year | -29.5% |
| 1894 | 0.8331 % change on previous year | +87.0% |
| 1895 | 0.4157 % change on previous year | -50.1% |
| 1896 | 0.5993 % change on previous year | +44.1% |
| 1897 | 0.4076 % change on previous year | -32.0% |
| 1898 | 0.1834 % change on previous year | -55.0% |
| 1899 | 0.3598 % change on previous year | +96.2% |
| 1900 | 2.91 % change on previous year | +707.8% |
| 1901 | 1.21 % change on previous year | -58.3% |
| 1902 | 0.7224 % change on previous year | -40.4% |
| 1903 | 0.8233 % change on previous year | +14.0% |
| 1904 | 0.8756 % change on previous year | +6.4% |
| 1905 | 0.6289 % change on previous year | -28.2% |
| 1906 | 0.7484 % change on previous year | +19.0% |
| 1907 | 0.4285 % change on previous year | -42.7% |
| 1908 | 0.7773 % change on previous year | +81.4% |
| 1909 | 0.5375 % change on previous year | -30.8% |
| 1910 | -3.91 % change on previous year | -826.8% |
| 1911 | -1.16 % change on previous year | -70.2% |
| 1912 | -1.36 % change on previous year | +16.4% |
| 1913 | -0.8555 % change on previous year | -36.9% |
| 1914 | -0.6948 % change on previous year | -18.8% |
| 1915 | -0.6296 % change on previous year | -9.4% |
| 1916 | -0.7637 % change on previous year | +21.3% |
| 1917 | -0.7661 % change on previous year | +0.3% |
| 1918 | -0.4792 % change on previous year | -37.5% |
| 1919 | -0.6087 % change on previous year | +27.0% |
| 1920 | 3.64 % change on previous year | -697.2% |
| 1921 | 1.61 % change on previous year | -55.6% |
| 1922 | 0.7354 % change on previous year | -54.5% |
| 1923 | 0.6678 % change on previous year | -9.2% |
| 1924 | 1.05 % change on previous year | +57.6% |
| 1925 | -0.0204 % change on previous year | -101.9% |
| 1926 | 0.3088 % change on previous year | -1614.9% |
| 1927 | 0.024 % change on previous year | -92.2% |
| 1928 | 0.4346 % change on previous year | +1708.8% |
| 1929 | -0.0695 % change on previous year | -116.0% |
| 1930 | -47.42 % change on previous year | +68093.0% |
| 1931 | -71.78 % change on previous year | +51.4% |
| 1932 | -217.08 % change on previous year | +202.4% |
| 1933 | -166.01 % change on previous year | -23.5% |
| 1934 | -54.47 % change on previous year | -67.2% |
| 1935 | -32.88 % change on previous year | -39.6% |
| 1936 | -22.24 % change on previous year | -32.3% |
| 1937 | -16.65 % change on previous year | -25.1% |
| 1938 | -13.12 % change on previous year | -21.2% |
| 1939 | -10.82 % change on previous year | -17.6% |
| 1940 | 62 % change on previous year | -673.0% |
| 1941 | 108.53 % change on previous year | +75.0% |
| 1942 | 987.35 % change on previous year | +809.8% |
| 1943 | 75.51 % change on previous year | -92.4% |
| 1944 | 37.04 % change on previous year | -51.0% |
| 1945 | 23.3 % change on previous year | -37.1% |
| 1946 | 16.6 % change on previous year | -28.7% |
| 1947 | 12.65 % change on previous year | -23.8% |
| 1948 | 10.02 % change on previous year | -20.8% |
| 1949 | 8.2 % change on previous year | -18.1% |
| 1950 | 33.83 % change on previous year | +312.5% |
| 1951 | 19.18 % change on previous year | -43.3% |
| 1952 | 13.76 % change on previous year | -28.3% |
| 1953 | 11.6 % change on previous year | -15.7% |
| 1954 | 9.5 % change on previous year | -18.1% |
| 1955 | 8.59 % change on previous year | -9.7% |
| 1956 | 7.29 % change on previous year | -15.1% |
| 1957 | 7.07 % change on previous year | -3.0% |
| 1958 | 6.13 % change on previous year | -13.3% |
| 1959 | 6.12 % change on previous year | -0.2% |
| 1960 | -20.25 % change on previous year | -431.2% |
| 1961 | -11.71 % change on previous year | -42.2% |
| 1962 | -17.77 % change on previous year | +51.7% |
| 1963 | -16.11 % change on previous year | -9.3% |
| 1964 | -13.74 % change on previous year | -14.7% |
| 1965 | -19.3 % change on previous year | +40.4% |
| 1966 | -12.35 % change on previous year | -36.0% |
| 1967 | -13.34 % change on previous year | +8.0% |
| 1968 | -7.63 % change on previous year | -42.8% |
| 1969 | -14.35 % change on previous year | +88.1% |
| 1970 | -8.56 % change on previous year | -40.4% |
| 1971 | -13.02 % change on previous year | +52.2% |
| 1972 | -14.33 % change on previous year | +10.0% |
| 1973 | 1.91 % change on previous year | -113.3% |
| 1974 | -19.84 % change on previous year | -1139.9% |
| 1975 | -8.85 % change on previous year | -55.4% |
| 1976 | -9.44 % change on previous year | +6.7% |
| 1977 | -21.38 % change on previous year | +126.5% |
| 1978 | -23.41 % change on previous year | +9.5% |
| 1979 | -3.81 % change on previous year | -83.7% |
| 1980 | 11.5 % change on previous year | -402.0% |
| 1981 | -12.31 % change on previous year | -207.1% |
| 1982 | -6.94 % change on previous year | -43.6% |
| 1983 | -22.68 % change on previous year | +226.8% |
| 1984 | -1.62 % change on previous year | -92.9% |
| 1985 | -6.62 % change on previous year | +308.6% |
| 1986 | -4.52 % change on previous year | -31.8% |
| 1987 | -41.32 % change on previous year | +814.1% |
| 1988 | -117.22 % change on previous year | +183.7% |
| 1989 | -371.73 % change on previous year | +217.1% |
| 1990 | 18.34 % change on previous year | -104.9% |
| 1991 | 151.68 % change on previous year | +727.2% |
| 1992 | -148.66 % change on previous year | -198.0% |
| 1994 | 42.09 % change on previous year | -128.3% |
| 1995 | -720.77 % change on previous year | -1812.4% |
| 1996 | 5.79 % change on previous year | -100.8% |
| 1997 | -4.06 % change on previous year | -170.1% |
| 1998 | 21.23 % change on previous year | -622.5% |
| 1999 | -104.51 % change on previous year | -592.3% |
| 2000 | -8.32 % change on previous year | -92.0% |
| 2001 | -14.97 % change on previous year | +80.0% |
| 2002 | 14.41 % change on previous year | -196.3% |
| 2003 | 17.95 % change on previous year | +24.6% |
| 2004 | 11.83 % change on previous year | -34.1% |
| 2005 | 10.14 % change on previous year | -14.3% |
| 2006 | 7.58 % change on previous year | -25.2% |
| 2007 | -0.2264 % change on previous year | -103.0% |
| 2008 | 17.02 % change on previous year | -7619.7% |
| 2009 | 10.41 % change on previous year | -38.8% |
| 2010 | 67.86 % change on previous year | +551.7% |
| 2011 | -5.91 % change on previous year | -108.7% |
| 2012 | -11.91 % change on previous year | +101.5% |
| 2013 | -19.87 % change on previous year | +66.8% |
| 2014 | 77.3 % change on previous year | -489.0% |
| 2015 | -228.1 % change on previous year | -395.1% |
| 2016 | -4.77 % change on previous year | -97.9% |
| 2017 | 20.26 % change on previous year | -524.3% |
| 2018 | -56.5 % change on previous year | -379.0% |
| 2019 | 48.01 % change on previous year | -185.0% |
| 2020 | 27.63 % change on previous year | -42.4% |
| 2021 | -51.09 % change on previous year | -284.9% |
| 2022 | 5.25 % change on previous year | -110.3% |
| 2023 | 4.52 % change on previous year | -13.9% |
| 2024 | 5.01 % change on previous year | +10.9% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 5.01 % change on previous year is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is -0.6131 % change on previous year. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1930 | -68093.0% | -0.0695 % change on previous year | -47.42 % change on previous year |
| 2008 | +7619.7% | -0.2264 % change on previous year | 17.02 % change on previous year |
| 1995 | -1812.4% | 42.09 % change on previous year | -720.77 % change on previous year |
| 1928 | +1708.8% | 0.024 % change on previous year | 0.4346 % change on previous year |
| 1926 | +1614.9% | -0.0204 % change on previous year | 0.3088 % change on previous year |
| 1870 | +1112.2% | -0.1674 % change on previous year | 1.69 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 0.3202 % change on previous year | 0.0478 % change on previous year | 0.7119 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1860s | 0.3604 % change on previous year | -0.1674 % change on previous year | 1.16 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.508 % change on previous year | 0.0916 % change on previous year | 1.69 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.3672 % change on previous year | -0.1771 % change on previous year | 1.01 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.5229 % change on previous year | 0.1834 % change on previous year | 0.9637 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.9661 % change on previous year | 0.4285 % change on previous year | 2.91 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1910s | -1.12 % change on previous year | -3.91 % change on previous year | -0.4792 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.8383 % change on previous year | -0.0695 % change on previous year | 3.64 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | -65.25 % change on previous year | -217.08 % change on previous year | -10.82 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | 134.12 % change on previous year | 8.2 % change on previous year | 987.35 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | 12.3 % change on previous year | 6.12 % change on previous year | 33.83 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | -14.66 % change on previous year | -20.25 % change on previous year | -7.63 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | -12.07 % change on previous year | -23.41 % change on previous year | 1.91 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -57.35 % change on previous year | -371.73 % change on previous year | 11.5 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -82.1 % change on previous year | -720.77 % change on previous year | 151.68 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 2000s | 6.58 % change on previous year | -14.97 % change on previous year | 17.95 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -11.37 % change on previous year | -228.1 % change on previous year | 77.3 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.74 % change on previous year | -51.09 % change on previous year | 27.63 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
- 38 Antigua and Barbuda 5.53 % change on previous year compare
- 39 Grenada 5.28 % change on previous year compare
- 40 Jordan 5.04 % change on previous year compare
- 42 Bolivia 4.97 % change on previous year compare
- 43 Switzerland 4.76 % change on previous year compare
- 44 Dominica 4.49 % change on previous year compare
More climate change data for Kazakhstan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 52.07 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 21,403 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,230 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 16,173 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 577.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,395 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 798.63 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.02 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan?
- Annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Kazakhstan was 5.01 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 987.35 % change on previous year in 1942.
- What is the lowest annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was -720.77 % change on previous year in 1995.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Kazakhstan ranks 41st out of 188 countries with data for 2024.
- Is annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 93.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 173 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.