Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per unit of GDP in Ecuador

Ecuador: Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per unit of GDP was 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2025)
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
Change on year
down 5.2%
World rank
51st
of 187 countries
All-time high
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 1990
All-time low
0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Years of data
36
1990–2025

Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per unit of GDP in Ecuador, 1990–2025

0000001990200720251990: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP1991: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP1992: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP1993: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP1994: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP1995: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP1996: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP1997: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP1998: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP1999: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2000: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2001: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2002: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2003: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2004: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2005: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2006: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2007: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2008: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2009: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2010: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2011: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2012: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2013: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2014: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2015: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2016: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2017: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2018: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2019: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2020: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2021: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2022: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2023: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2024: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP2025: 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 ha per US$ of GDP.

Analysis

Ecuador recorded 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP for carbon stock change in forests — area, per unit of gdp in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 36 years on record.

That represents a change of down 5.2% on the previous year and down 28.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, carbon stock change in forests — area, per unit of gdp in Ecuador peaked at 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in 1990 and was at its lowest, 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, in 2025.

Ecuador ranks 51st of 187 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per unit of GDP in Ecuador, year by year

Annual values for Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per unit of GDP in Ecuador, 1990 to 2025.
Year 1000 ha per US$ of GDP Change
1990 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP —
1991 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -10.8%
1992 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -6.7%
1993 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -5.1%
1994 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -17.1%
1995 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -7.6%
1996 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -3.8%
1997 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -11.0%
1998 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -0.0%
1999 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP +41.5%
2000 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP +11.3%
2001 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -24.7%
2002 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -15.0%
2003 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -13.1%
2004 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -12.5%
2005 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -13.1%
2006 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -12.3%
2007 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -8.8%
2008 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -18.9%
2009 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP +1.2%
2010 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -12.3%
2011 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -14.1%
2012 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -10.3%
2013 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -9.4%
2014 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -6.3%
2015 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP +5.3%
2016 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -0.9%
2017 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -7.0%
2018 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -3.3%
2019 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -0.7%
2020 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP +11.6%
2021 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -11.1%
2022 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -7.9%
2023 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -4.1%
2024 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -2.7%
2025 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP -5.2%

Ecuador compared with similar countries

  • Ecuador's 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, 2.7× the median. (52 countries reporting)
  • Ecuador's 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP, 3.3× the median. (37 countries reporting)

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per unit of GDP in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
1999 +41.5% 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP 10
2000s 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP 10
2010s 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP 10
2020s 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP 6

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 48 New Caledonia 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  2. 49 Togo 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  3. 50 Belarus 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  4. 52 Montenegro 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  5. 53 Mauritania 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP compare
  6. 54 Eswatini 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP compare

See the full ranking of 188 places →

More climate change data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is carbon stock change in forests — area, per unit of gdp in Ecuador?
Carbon stock change in forests — area, per unit of gdp in Ecuador was 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest carbon stock change in forests — area, per unit of gdp recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in 1990.
What is the lowest carbon stock change in forests — area, per unit of gdp recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 0 1000 ha per US$ of GDP in 2025.
How does Ecuador rank for carbon stock change in forests — area, per unit of gdp?
Ecuador ranks 51st out of 187 countries with data for 2025.
Is carbon stock change in forests — area, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is down 28.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 36 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per unit of GDP in Ecuador. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-area-per-unit-of-gdp/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/carbon-stock-change-in-forests-area-per-unit-of-gdp/ecuador/">Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per unit of GDP in Ecuador</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Carbon stock change in forests — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Carbon stock change in forests — Area ÷ GDP (current US$)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Carbon stock change in forests — Area, per unit of GDP
Unit
1000 ha per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 6,462 data points, 1990–2025
Last refreshed

Carbon stock change in forests — Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.