Change co2 annual pct, gaps filled in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Change co2 annual pct, gaps filled was 0.2904 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Change co2 annual pct, gaps filled in Kazakhstan, 1831–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived).
Analysis
The most recent figure for change co2 annual pct, gaps filled in Kazakhstan is 0.2904, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of down 93.3% on the previous year and down 98.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, change co2 annual pct, gaps filled in Kazakhstan peaked at 215.97 in 1866 and was at its lowest, -60.12, in 1918.
That places Kazakhstan 160th out of 215 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Change co2 annual pct, gaps filled in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1831 | 19.98 | — |
| 1832 | -33.31 | -266.7% |
| 1833 | 24.97 | -175.0% |
| 1859 | 6.06 | -75.7% |
| 1860 | 32.14 | +430.4% |
| 1861 | 27.03 | -15.9% |
| 1862 | -9.79 | -136.2% |
| 1863 | 4.72 | -148.2% |
| 1864 | 12.16 | +157.9% |
| 1865 | -4.42 | -136.3% |
| 1866 | 215.97 | -4988.0% |
| 1867 | 14.76 | -93.2% |
| 1868 | -16.8 | -213.8% |
| 1869 | 35.65 | -312.2% |
| 1870 | 8.52 | -76.1% |
| 1871 | 35 | +310.8% |
| 1872 | 2.66 | -92.4% |
| 1873 | -6.14 | -330.7% |
| 1874 | 21.38 | -448.0% |
| 1875 | 15.1 | -29.4% |
| 1876 | 24.15 | +60.0% |
| 1877 | 2.05 | -91.5% |
| 1878 | 30.69 | +1393.8% |
| 1879 | 2.61 | -91.5% |
| 1880 | 17.31 | +563.4% |
| 1881 | 5.33 | -69.2% |
| 1882 | 5.33 | +0.1% |
| 1883 | 13.82 | +159.2% |
| 1884 | 1.53 | -88.9% |
| 1885 | 8.92 | +483.0% |
| 1886 | 2.56 | -71.3% |
| 1887 | 5.82 | +127.0% |
| 1888 | 4.31 | -25.9% |
| 1889 | 8 | +85.6% |
| 1890 | 13.25 | +65.7% |
| 1891 | 10.1 | -23.7% |
| 1892 | 5.85 | -42.1% |
| 1893 | 17.21 | +194.1% |
| 1894 | 1.85 | -89.3% |
| 1895 | 14.9 | +706.0% |
| 1896 | 1.8 | -87.9% |
| 1897 | 15.62 | +767.9% |
| 1898 | 12.15 | -22.2% |
| 1899 | 16.01 | +31.7% |
| 1900 | 13.28 | -17.0% |
| 1901 | 2.66 | -79.9% |
| 1902 | -3.42 | -228.2% |
| 1903 | -2.18 | -36.2% |
| 1904 | 11.26 | -616.2% |
| 1905 | -10.74 | -195.4% |
| 1906 | 14.06 | -231.0% |
| 1907 | 12.01 | -14.6% |
| 1908 | 0.6134 | -94.9% |
| 1909 | 5.56 | +806.7% |
| 1910 | -1.93 | -134.7% |
| 1911 | 3.68 | -290.6% |
| 1912 | 13.28 | +261.0% |
| 1913 | 8.63 | -35.0% |
| 1914 | -9.75 | -212.9% |
| 1915 | -8.21 | -15.7% |
| 1916 | 6.58 | -180.1% |
| 1917 | -7.97 | -221.0% |
| 1918 | -60.12 | +654.6% |
| 1919 | -14.59 | -75.7% |
| 1920 | -8.81 | -39.6% |
| 1921 | 8.45 | -195.9% |
| 1922 | 21.96 | +159.9% |
| 1923 | 10.46 | -52.3% |
| 1924 | 19.14 | +82.9% |
| 1925 | -1.3 | -106.8% |
| 1926 | 44.89 | -3549.1% |
| 1927 | 24.33 | -45.8% |
| 1928 | 11.39 | -53.2% |
| 1929 | 7.72 | -32.2% |
| 1930 | 35.86 | +364.6% |
| 1931 | 20.1 | -43.9% |
| 1932 | 12.69 | -36.9% |
| 1933 | 11.7 | -7.8% |
| 1934 | 20.98 | +79.4% |
| 1935 | 13.22 | -37.0% |
| 1936 | 14.71 | +11.2% |
| 1937 | 2.23 | -84.8% |
| 1938 | 5.54 | +148.4% |
| 1939 | 1.22 | -77.9% |
| 1940 | 19.86 | +1522.0% |
| 1941 | -12.13 | -161.1% |
| 1942 | -45.75 | +277.2% |
| 1943 | 4.37 | -109.5% |
| 1944 | 45.02 | +931.2% |
| 1945 | 5.96 | -86.8% |
| 1946 | 12.44 | +108.9% |
| 1947 | 20.45 | +64.3% |
| 1948 | 6.46 | -68.4% |
| 1949 | 13.69 | +112.0% |
| 1950 | 11.51 | -15.9% |
| 1951 | 8.4 | -27.0% |
| 1952 | 7.1 | -15.5% |
| 1953 | 5.82 | -18.1% |
| 1954 | 9.25 | +59.0% |
| 1955 | 13.41 | +45.0% |
| 1956 | 9.64 | -28.1% |
| 1957 | 9.45 | -2.0% |
| 1958 | 6.75 | -28.5% |
| 1959 | 5.17 | -23.5% |
| 1960 | 4.15 | -19.7% |
| 1961 | 3.13 | -24.5% |
| 1962 | 4.95 | +58.0% |
| 1963 | 7.22 | +45.7% |
| 1964 | 6.32 | -12.3% |
| 1965 | 6.08 | -3.8% |
| 1966 | 5.61 | -7.8% |
| 1967 | 4.54 | -19.0% |
| 1968 | 2.78 | -38.8% |
| 1969 | 4.12 | +48.1% |
| 1970 | 5.21 | +26.5% |
| 1971 | 6.03 | +15.8% |
| 1972 | 5.15 | -14.7% |
| 1973 | 4.15 | -19.3% |
| 1974 | 3.73 | -10.1% |
| 1975 | 5.04 | +35.1% |
| 1976 | 3.75 | -25.5% |
| 1977 | 3.31 | -11.9% |
| 1978 | 3.34 | +1.0% |
| 1979 | 0.7569 | -77.3% |
| 1980 | 3.88 | +413.0% |
| 1981 | -2.03 | -152.4% |
| 1982 | 1.85 | -190.7% |
| 1983 | 1.33 | -28.1% |
| 1984 | 0.8039 | -39.4% |
| 1985 | 7.88 | +880.0% |
| 1986 | 1.97 | -75.0% |
| 1987 | -0.5612 | -128.5% |
| 1988 | 6.64 | -1283.4% |
| 1989 | -3.33 | -150.2% |
| 1990 | 1.06 | -131.7% |
| 1991 | -2.61 | -346.9% |
| 1992 | -10.33 | +295.4% |
| 1993 | -11.12 | +7.7% |
| 1994 | -15.85 | +42.5% |
| 1995 | -3.55 | -77.6% |
| 1996 | -8.16 | +129.9% |
| 1997 | -4.8 | -41.2% |
| 1998 | -1.13 | -76.3% |
| 1999 | -18.45 | +1525.6% |
| 2000 | 19.73 | -207.0% |
| 2001 | -2.93 | -114.8% |
| 2002 | 13.57 | -563.8% |
| 2003 | 11.64 | -14.2% |
| 2004 | 5.97 | -48.7% |
| 2005 | 6.99 | +17.1% |
| 2006 | 10.68 | +52.6% |
| 2007 | 2.77 | -74.1% |
| 2008 | 0.1728 | -93.8% |
| 2009 | -1.29 | -845.7% |
| 2010 | 11.16 | -966.0% |
| 2011 | -4 | -135.9% |
| 2012 | 2.98 | -174.5% |
| 2013 | 3.37 | +13.0% |
| 2014 | 17.99 | +433.5% |
| 2015 | 1.31 | -92.7% |
| 2016 | -0.4334 | -133.1% |
| 2017 | 5.3 | -1322.0% |
| 2018 | 3.73 | -29.6% |
| 2019 | -10.17 | -372.8% |
| 2020 | -4.81 | -52.7% |
| 2021 | -13.09 | +171.9% |
| 2022 | 12.02 | -191.8% |
| 2023 | 4.31 | -64.1% |
| 2024 | 0.2904 | -93.3% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 0.2904 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 2.72, 11% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 0.2904 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is -0.0042. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Change co2 annual pct, gaps filled in Kazakhstan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1866 | +4988.0% | -4.42 | 215.97 |
| 1926 | +3549.1% | -1.3 | 44.89 |
| 1940 | +1522.0% | 1.22 | 19.86 |
| 1999 | -1525.6% | -1.13 | -18.45 |
| 1878 | +1393.8% | 2.05 | 30.69 |
| 2017 | +1322.0% | -0.4334 | 5.3 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 3.88 | -33.31 | 24.97 | 3 |
| 1850s | 6.06 | 6.06 | 6.06 | 1 |
| 1860s | 31.14 | -16.8 | 215.97 | 10 |
| 1870s | 13.6 | -6.14 | 35 | 10 |
| 1880s | 7.29 | 1.53 | 17.31 | 10 |
| 1890s | 10.87 | 1.8 | 17.21 | 10 |
| 1900s | 4.31 | -10.74 | 14.06 | 10 |
| 1910s | -7.04 | -60.12 | 13.28 | 10 |
| 1920s | 13.82 | -8.81 | 44.89 | 10 |
| 1930s | 13.83 | 1.22 | 35.86 | 10 |
| 1940s | 7.04 | -45.75 | 45.02 | 10 |
| 1950s | 8.65 | 5.17 | 13.41 | 10 |
| 1960s | 4.89 | 2.78 | 7.22 | 10 |
| 1970s | 4.05 | 0.7569 | 6.03 | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.84 | -3.33 | 7.88 | 10 |
| 1990s | -7.49 | -18.45 | 1.06 | 10 |
| 2000s | 6.73 | -2.93 | 19.73 | 10 |
| 2010s | 3.12 | -10.17 | 17.99 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.2559 | -13.09 | 12.02 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More climate change data for Kazakhstan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 52.07 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 21,403 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,230 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 16,173 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 577.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,395 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 798.63 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.02 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is change co2 annual pct, gaps filled in Kazakhstan?
- Change co2 annual pct, gaps filled in Kazakhstan was 0.2904 in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest change co2 annual pct, gaps filled recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 215.97 in 1866.
- What is the lowest change co2 annual pct, gaps filled recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was -60.12 in 1918.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for change co2 annual pct, gaps filled?
- Kazakhstan ranks 160th out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
- Is change co2 annual pct, gaps filled rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 98.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Change co2 annual pct, gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 169 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Change co2 annual pct with 67 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Change co2 annual pct Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Change co2 annual pct with 67 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.