Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) in Spain
Spain: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Spain, 1990–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in Spain is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.
The figure is up 223.2% on the previous year and down 82.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in Spain peaked at 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 2011.
Spain ranks 42nd of 183 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) in Spain, year by year
| Year | ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1991 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 1992 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -8.5% |
| 1993 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +20.2% |
| 1994 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -1.0% |
| 1995 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -13.7% |
| 1996 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +82.3% |
| 1997 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +6.4% |
| 1998 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +75.4% |
| 1999 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -27.9% |
| 2000 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +39.2% |
| 2001 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -90.5% |
| 2002 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -3.5% |
| 2003 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +36.9% |
| 2004 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -77.5% |
| 2005 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +352.5% |
| 2006 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -83.5% |
| 2007 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +1028.3% |
| 2008 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -91.6% |
| 2009 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +703.6% |
| 2010 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -83.4% |
| 2011 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -91.1% |
| 2012 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +18633.9% |
| 2013 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -91.3% |
| 2014 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +312.6% |
| 2015 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -46.2% |
| 2016 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -54.8% |
| 2017 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +64.2% |
| 2018 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -74.0% |
| 2019 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +406.3% |
| 2020 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -70.0% |
| 2021 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +238.8% |
| 2022 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +117.5% |
| 2023 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -95.3% |
| 2024 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +223.2% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) in Spain changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | +18633.9% | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP |
| 2007 | +1028.3% | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Spain
More climate change data for Spain
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 944.68 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 31,851 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 7,475 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 24,376 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 28.21 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 870.55 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 8,160 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 6,530 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,630 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 24.64 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in Spain?
- Closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in Spain was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in Spain?
- The highest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2000.
- What is the lowest closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in Spain?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2011.
- How does Spain rank for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Spain ranks 42nd out of 183 countries with data for 2024.
- Is closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Spain?
- Over the last ten years it is down 82.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Spain data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.