Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) in World
World: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in World, 1990–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
The most recent figure for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in World is 0 ha per US$ of GDP, measured in 2024.
The figure is down 72.9% on the previous year and down 45.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in World peaked at 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2001 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 2020.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) in World, year by year
| Year | ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1991 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -4.2% |
| 1992 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -6.4% |
| 1993 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -1.7% |
| 1994 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -7.1% |
| 1995 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -10.4% |
| 1996 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -14.4% |
| 1997 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -1.4% |
| 1998 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +38.8% |
| 1999 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +31.6% |
| 2000 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +13.4% |
| 2001 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +5.6% |
| 2002 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -7.0% |
| 2003 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -77.5% |
| 2004 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +73.0% |
| 2005 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -65.7% |
| 2006 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +176.8% |
| 2007 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -17.6% |
| 2008 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -48.1% |
| 2009 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -7.6% |
| 2010 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -0.2% |
| 2011 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +303.5% |
| 2012 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -16.6% |
| 2013 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -77.4% |
| 2014 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +51.3% |
| 2015 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +7.6% |
| 2016 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -57.0% |
| 2017 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +219.8% |
| 2018 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -20.3% |
| 2019 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -50.6% |
| 2020 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -33.8% |
| 2021 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +66.9% |
| 2022 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -7.1% |
| 2023 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +237.2% |
| 2024 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -72.9% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) in World changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | +303.5% | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP |
| 2023 | +237.2% | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP |
| 2017 | +219.8% | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near World
More climate change data for World
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 135.91 billion kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 4.94 million kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1.27 million kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3.67 million kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 4,791 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 130,918 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1.64 million kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 957,726 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 685,096 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 3,614 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in World?
- Closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in World was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in World?
- The highest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2001.
- What is the lowest closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in World?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2020.
- How does World rank for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- World ranks 1st out of 1 groups with data for 2024.
- Is closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp rising or falling in World?
- Over the last ten years it is down 45.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this World data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.