Co2 emissions by fuel line in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Co2 emissions by fuel line was 69.42 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
69.42 million
Change on year
up 3.7%
World rank
28th
of 215 countries
All-time high
69.42 million
in 2024
All-time low
0
in 1830
Years of data
173
1830–2024
Co2 emissions by fuel line in Kazakhstan, 1830–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Kazakhstan recorded 69.42 million for co2 emissions by fuel line in 2024. That is the highest value across all 173 years on record.
That represents a change of up 3.7% on the previous year and up 74.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 emissions by fuel line in Kazakhstan peaked at 69.42 million in 2024 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1830.
That places Kazakhstan 28th out of 215 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 emissions by fuel line in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1830 | 0 | — |
| 1831 | 0 | — |
| 1832 | 0 | — |
| 1833 | 0 | — |
| 1850 | 0 | — |
| 1855 | 0 | — |
| 1858 | 0 | — |
| 1859 | 0 | — |
| 1860 | 328 | — |
| 1861 | 326 | -0.6% |
| 1862 | 328 | +0.6% |
| 1863 | 549 | +67.4% |
| 1864 | 771 | +40.4% |
| 1865 | 884 | +14.7% |
| 1866 | 982 | +11.1% |
| 1867 | 1,423 | +44.9% |
| 1868 | 2,651 | +86.3% |
| 1869 | 2,526 | -4.7% |
| 1870 | 2,523 | -0.1% |
| 1871 | 2,075 | -17.8% |
| 1872 | 2,295 | +10.6% |
| 1873 | 5,193 | +126.3% |
| 1874 | 8,218 | +58.3% |
| 1875 | 13,241 | +61.1% |
| 1876 | 21,902 | +65.4% |
| 1877 | 31,813 | +45.3% |
| 1878 | 38,074 | +19.7% |
| 1879 | 48,143 | +26.4% |
| 1880 | 54,414 | +13.0% |
| 1881 | 76,823 | +41.2% |
| 1882 | 83,633 | +8.9% |
| 1883 | 92,065 | +10.1% |
| 1884 | 139,969 | +52.0% |
| 1885 | 181,975 | +30.0% |
| 1886 | 189,386 | +4.1% |
| 1887 | 248,162 | +31.0% |
| 1888 | 271,147 | +9.3% |
| 1889 | 266,365 | -1.8% |
| 1890 | 330,266 | +24.0% |
| 1891 | 415,545 | +25.8% |
| 1892 | 429,863 | +3.4% |
| 1893 | 509,385 | +18.5% |
| 1894 | 453,385 | -11.0% |
| 1895 | 649,409 | +43.2% |
| 1896 | 640,301 | -1.4% |
| 1897 | 726,078 | +13.4% |
| 1898 | 821,498 | +13.1% |
| 1899 | 859,837 | +4.7% |
| 1900 | 1.01 million | +17.6% |
| 1901 | 1.16 million | +15.2% |
| 1902 | 1.09 million | -6.2% |
| 1903 | 965,851 | -11.6% |
| 1904 | 991,012 | +2.6% |
| 1905 | 697,683 | -29.6% |
| 1906 | 793,557 | +13.7% |
| 1907 | 828,797 | +4.4% |
| 1908 | 829,093 | +0.0% |
| 1909 | 889,389 | +7.3% |
| 1910 | 930,319 | +4.6% |
| 1911 | 864,692 | -7.1% |
| 1912 | 863,550 | -0.1% |
| 1913 | 823,641 | -4.6% |
| 1914 | 875,144 | +6.3% |
| 1915 | 985,433 | +12.6% |
| 1916 | 1.05 million | +7.0% |
| 1917 | 929,481 | -11.8% |
| 1918 | 397,191 | -57.3% |
| 1919 | 517,272 | +30.2% |
| 1920 | 449,980 | -13.0% |
| 1921 | 426,282 | -5.3% |
| 1922 | 522,826 | +22.6% |
| 1923 | 588,708 | +12.6% |
| 1924 | 591,114 | +0.4% |
| 1925 | 640,919 | +8.4% |
| 1926 | 732,933 | +14.4% |
| 1927 | 876,216 | +19.5% |
| 1928 | 842,166 | -3.9% |
| 1929 | 1.06 million | +25.4% |
| 1930 | 2.08 million | +97.2% |
| 1931 | 2.53 million | +21.3% |
| 1932 | 2.29 million | -9.4% |
| 1933 | 2.26 million | -1.1% |
| 1934 | 2.54 million | +12.0% |
| 1935 | 2.64 million | +4.1% |
| 1936 | 2.85 million | +8.0% |
| 1937 | 3.00 million | +4.9% |
| 1938 | 3.18 million | +6.1% |
| 1939 | 3.20 million | +0.6% |
| 1940 | 3.22 million | +0.7% |
| 1941 | 3.36 million | +4.5% |
| 1942 | 3.61 million | +7.2% |
| 1943 | 3.07 million | -14.8% |
| 1944 | 4.12 million | +34.1% |
| 1945 | 1.96 million | -52.4% |
| 1946 | 2.26 million | +15.0% |
| 1947 | 2.74 million | +21.6% |
| 1948 | 3.07 million | +11.9% |
| 1949 | 3.58 million | +16.8% |
| 1950 | 4.00 million | +11.7% |
| 1951 | 4.32 million | +7.9% |
| 1952 | 4.90 million | +13.4% |
| 1953 | 5.43 million | +10.9% |
| 1954 | 6.04 million | +11.2% |
| 1955 | 7.07 million | +17.1% |
| 1956 | 8.31 million | +17.4% |
| 1957 | 9.52 million | +14.6% |
| 1958 | 10.86 million | +14.1% |
| 1959 | 12.05 million | +11.0% |
| 1960 | 13.45 million | +11.6% |
| 1961 | 14.97 million | +11.3% |
| 1962 | 17.25 million | +15.2% |
| 1963 | 19.26 million | +11.7% |
| 1964 | 21.06 million | +9.4% |
| 1965 | 22.82 million | +8.3% |
| 1966 | 24.68 million | +8.2% |
| 1967 | 27.40 million | +11.0% |
| 1968 | 29.77 million | +8.7% |
| 1969 | 32.30 million | +8.5% |
| 1970 | 34.72 million | +7.5% |
| 1971 | 37.68 million | +8.5% |
| 1972 | 41.27 million | +9.5% |
| 1973 | 44.93 million | +8.9% |
| 1974 | 48.86 million | +8.8% |
| 1975 | 52.19 million | +6.8% |
| 1976 | 53.93 million | +3.3% |
| 1977 | 56.39 million | +4.6% |
| 1978 | 61.44 million | +9.0% |
| 1979 | 62.26 million | +1.3% |
| 1980 | 63.46 million | +1.9% |
| 1981 | 66.60 million | +5.0% |
| 1982 | 67.33 million | +1.1% |
| 1983 | 68.27 million | +1.4% |
| 1984 | 67.68 million | -0.9% |
| 1985 | 67.18 million | -0.7% |
| 1986 | 60.95 million | -9.3% |
| 1987 | 51.51 million | -15.5% |
| 1988 | 52.34 million | +1.6% |
| 1989 | 52.65 million | +0.6% |
| 1990 | 56.76 million | +7.8% |
| 1991 | 53.56 million | -5.6% |
| 1992 | 39.38 million | -26.5% |
| 1993 | 33.15 million | -15.8% |
| 1994 | 27.67 million | -16.6% |
| 1995 | 28.63 million | +3.5% |
| 1996 | 27.94 million | -2.4% |
| 1997 | 29.70 million | +6.3% |
| 1998 | 29.75 million | +0.1% |
| 1999 | 19.18 million | -35.5% |
| 2000 | 24.38 million | +27.1% |
| 2001 | 23.40 million | -4.0% |
| 2002 | 35.41 million | +51.3% |
| 2003 | 39.27 million | +10.9% |
| 2004 | 41.38 million | +5.4% |
| 2005 | 51.56 million | +24.6% |
| 2006 | 55.41 million | +7.5% |
| 2007 | 55.40 million | -0.0% |
| 2008 | 52.60 million | -5.1% |
| 2009 | 39.46 million | -25.0% |
| 2010 | 51.69 million | +31.0% |
| 2011 | 39.43 million | -23.7% |
| 2012 | 39.29 million | -0.4% |
| 2013 | 49.46 million | +25.9% |
| 2014 | 39.73 million | -19.7% |
| 2015 | 40.80 million | +2.7% |
| 2016 | 42.12 million | +3.2% |
| 2017 | 44.11 million | +4.7% |
| 2018 | 47.98 million | +8.8% |
| 2019 | 47.92 million | -0.1% |
| 2020 | 47.22 million | -1.5% |
| 2021 | 62.45 million | +32.3% |
| 2022 | 64.98 million | +4.0% |
| 2023 | 66.98 million | +3.1% |
| 2024 | 69.42 million | +3.7% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 69.42 million is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 9.32 million, 7.4× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 69.42 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 14.44 million, 4.8× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 emissions by fuel line in Kazakhstan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1873 | +126.3% | 2,295 | 5,193 |
| 1930 | +97.2% | 1.06 million | 2.08 million |
| 1868 | +86.3% | 1,423 | 2,651 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| 1860s | 1,077 | 326 | 2,651 | 10 |
| 1870s | 17,348 | 2,075 | 48,143 | 10 |
| 1880s | 160,394 | 54,414 | 271,147 | 10 |
| 1890s | 583,557 | 330,266 | 859,837 | 10 |
| 1900s | 926,425 | 697,683 | 1.16 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 824,105 | 397,191 | 1.05 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 672,752 | 426,282 | 1.06 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 2.66 million | 2.08 million | 3.20 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 3.10 million | 1.96 million | 4.12 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 7.25 million | 4.00 million | 12.05 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 22.30 million | 13.45 million | 32.30 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 49.37 million | 34.72 million | 62.26 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 61.80 million | 51.51 million | 68.27 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 34.57 million | 19.18 million | 56.76 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 41.83 million | 23.40 million | 55.41 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 44.25 million | 39.29 million | 51.69 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 62.21 million | 47.22 million | 69.42 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More climate change data for Kazakhstan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 52.07 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 21,403 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,230 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 16,173 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 577.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,395 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 798.63 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.02 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 emissions by fuel line in Kazakhstan?
- Co2 emissions by fuel line in Kazakhstan was 69.42 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 emissions by fuel line recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 69.42 million in 2024.
- What is the lowest co2 emissions by fuel line recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1830.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for co2 emissions by fuel line?
- Kazakhstan ranks 28th out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 emissions by fuel line rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 74.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 emissions by fuel line. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 173 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).