Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled in Cuba
Cuba: Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled was 2.23 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled in Cuba, 1856–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived).
Analysis
The most recent figure for co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled in Cuba is 2.23, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of up 4.5% on the previous year and down 8.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled in Cuba peaked at 3.48 in 1982 and was at its lowest, 0.0584, in 1949.
Cuba ranks 127th of 213 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled in Cuba, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1856 | 0.2931 | — |
| 1857 | 0.2704 | -7.7% |
| 1858 | 0.2494 | -7.7% |
| 1859 | 0.2311 | -7.3% |
| 1860 | 0.2151 | -7.0% |
| 1861 | 0.318 | +47.9% |
| 1862 | 0.426 | +34.0% |
| 1863 | 0.2678 | -37.1% |
| 1864 | 0.4436 | +65.6% |
| 1865 | 0.4292 | -3.3% |
| 1866 | 0.4334 | +1.0% |
| 1867 | 0.4665 | +7.6% |
| 1868 | 0.4432 | -5.0% |
| 1869 | 0.5065 | +14.3% |
| 1870 | 0.4615 | -8.9% |
| 1871 | 0.4461 | -3.4% |
| 1872 | 0.4484 | +0.5% |
| 1873 | 0.4589 | +2.3% |
| 1874 | 0.4589 | -0.0% |
| 1875 | 0.454 | -1.1% |
| 1876 | 0.3855 | -15.1% |
| 1877 | 0.3988 | +3.4% |
| 1878 | 0.458 | +14.9% |
| 1879 | 0.4595 | +0.3% |
| 1880 | 0.3844 | -16.4% |
| 1881 | 0.3913 | +1.8% |
| 1882 | 0.3935 | +0.6% |
| 1883 | 0.3788 | -3.8% |
| 1884 | 0.369 | -2.6% |
| 1885 | 0.3812 | +3.3% |
| 1886 | 0.3575 | -6.2% |
| 1887 | 0.3963 | +10.9% |
| 1888 | 0.438 | +10.5% |
| 1889 | 0.4825 | +10.2% |
| 1890 | 0.467 | -3.2% |
| 1891 | 0.5567 | +19.2% |
| 1892 | 0.6138 | +10.2% |
| 1893 | 0.5806 | -5.4% |
| 1894 | 0.6239 | +7.5% |
| 1895 | 0.595 | -4.6% |
| 1896 | 0.476 | -20.0% |
| 1897 | 0.4491 | -5.6% |
| 1898 | 0.4973 | +10.7% |
| 1899 | 0.5547 | +11.5% |
| 1900 | 0.5489 | -1.0% |
| 1901 | 0.5801 | +5.7% |
| 1902 | 0.5527 | -4.7% |
| 1903 | 0.6564 | +18.8% |
| 1904 | 0.7081 | +7.9% |
| 1905 | 0.8388 | +18.5% |
| 1906 | 0.9323 | +11.1% |
| 1907 | 0.9351 | +0.3% |
| 1908 | 0.885 | -5.4% |
| 1909 | 0.9078 | +2.6% |
| 1910 | 1.05 | +15.5% |
| 1911 | 1.2 | +14.6% |
| 1912 | 1.36 | +12.9% |
| 1913 | 1.32 | -2.7% |
| 1914 | 1.17 | -11.1% |
| 1915 | 1.18 | +0.9% |
| 1916 | 1.33 | +12.7% |
| 1917 | 1.42 | +6.1% |
| 1918 | 1.34 | -5.2% |
| 1919 | 0.9003 | -32.9% |
| 1920 | 1.18 | +31.3% |
| 1921 | 0.4798 | -59.4% |
| 1922 | 0.4269 | -11.0% |
| 1923 | 0.5419 | +26.9% |
| 1924 | 0.4624 | -14.7% |
| 1925 | 0.4891 | +5.8% |
| 1926 | 0.4582 | -6.3% |
| 1927 | 0.4515 | -1.5% |
| 1928 | 0.4251 | -5.8% |
| 1929 | 0.224 | -47.3% |
| 1930 | 0.3309 | +47.7% |
| 1931 | 0.2397 | -27.6% |
| 1932 | 0.1895 | -20.9% |
| 1933 | 0.1826 | -3.7% |
| 1934 | 0.193 | +5.7% |
| 1935 | 0.1843 | -4.5% |
| 1936 | 0.2109 | +14.4% |
| 1937 | 0.221 | +4.8% |
| 1938 | 0.1953 | -11.7% |
| 1939 | 0.1526 | -21.8% |
| 1940 | 0.1448 | -5.2% |
| 1941 | 0.117 | -19.2% |
| 1942 | 0.0956 | -18.3% |
| 1943 | 0.1458 | +52.5% |
| 1944 | 0.1023 | -29.9% |
| 1945 | 0.1055 | +3.1% |
| 1946 | 0.0883 | -16.3% |
| 1947 | 0.1006 | +13.9% |
| 1948 | 0.074 | -26.5% |
| 1949 | 0.0584 | -21.0% |
| 1950 | 0.9522 | +1529.0% |
| 1951 | 1.07 | +12.4% |
| 1952 | 1.02 | -4.8% |
| 1953 | 0.9849 | -3.4% |
| 1954 | 0.9276 | -5.8% |
| 1955 | 1.04 | +11.7% |
| 1956 | 0.875 | -15.5% |
| 1957 | 2.04 | +132.6% |
| 1958 | 2.59 | +27.2% |
| 1959 | 2.21 | -14.7% |
| 1960 | 1.89 | -14.4% |
| 1961 | 1.65 | -12.9% |
| 1962 | 1.88 | +13.9% |
| 1963 | 1.69 | -9.9% |
| 1964 | 1.82 | +7.3% |
| 1965 | 1.82 | +0.1% |
| 1966 | 1.85 | +1.9% |
| 1967 | 1.88 | +1.8% |
| 1968 | 1.88 | -0.1% |
| 1969 | 1.99 | +5.7% |
| 1970 | 2.11 | +6.2% |
| 1971 | 2.18 | +3.2% |
| 1972 | 2.28 | +4.4% |
| 1973 | 2.42 | +6.2% |
| 1974 | 2.44 | +1.0% |
| 1975 | 2.85 | +16.8% |
| 1976 | 2.84 | -0.4% |
| 1977 | 3.04 | +7.1% |
| 1978 | 3.16 | +3.7% |
| 1979 | 3.25 | +2.8% |
| 1980 | 3.2 | -1.4% |
| 1981 | 3.32 | +3.8% |
| 1982 | 3.48 | +4.8% |
| 1983 | 3.08 | -11.4% |
| 1984 | 3.23 | +4.8% |
| 1985 | 3.21 | -0.9% |
| 1986 | 3.27 | +2.2% |
| 1987 | 3.28 | +0.3% |
| 1988 | 3.41 | +4.0% |
| 1989 | 3.39 | -0.7% |
| 1990 | 2.79 | -17.8% |
| 1991 | 2.52 | -9.8% |
| 1992 | 1.92 | -23.5% |
| 1993 | 1.83 | -5.1% |
| 1994 | 1.97 | +7.8% |
| 1995 | 2.09 | +6.3% |
| 1996 | 2.13 | +1.6% |
| 1997 | 2.26 | +6.2% |
| 1998 | 2.2 | -2.4% |
| 1999 | 2.21 | +0.4% |
| 2000 | 2.28 | +3.0% |
| 2001 | 2.21 | -2.8% |
| 2002 | 2.25 | +1.7% |
| 2003 | 2.28 | +1.2% |
| 2004 | 2.18 | -4.2% |
| 2005 | 2.28 | +4.5% |
| 2006 | 2.37 | +4.0% |
| 2007 | 2.28 | -4.0% |
| 2008 | 2.46 | +7.8% |
| 2009 | 2.5 | +1.9% |
| 2010 | 2.92 | +16.9% |
| 2011 | 2.57 | -12.0% |
| 2012 | 2.61 | +1.4% |
| 2013 | 2.47 | -5.3% |
| 2014 | 2.42 | -1.8% |
| 2015 | 2.58 | +6.4% |
| 2016 | 2.47 | -4.5% |
| 2017 | 2.18 | -11.4% |
| 2018 | 2.05 | -6.1% |
| 2019 | 2.01 | -2.1% |
| 2020 | 1.9 | -5.1% |
| 2021 | 2.03 | +6.5% |
| 2022 | 2.1 | +3.7% |
| 2023 | 2.13 | +1.3% |
| 2024 | 2.23 | +4.5% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 2.23 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.04, 73% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 2.23 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 2.93, 76% of the median. (38 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled in Cuba changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | +1529.0% | 0.0584 | 0.9522 |
| 1957 | +132.6% | 0.875 | 2.04 |
| 1864 | +65.6% | 0.2678 | 0.4436 |
| 1921 | -59.4% | 1.18 | 0.4798 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 0.261 | 0.2311 | 0.2931 | 4 |
| 1860s | 0.3949 | 0.2151 | 0.5065 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.443 | 0.3855 | 0.4615 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.3973 | 0.3575 | 0.4825 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.5414 | 0.4491 | 0.6239 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.7545 | 0.5489 | 0.9351 | 10 |
| 1910s | 1.23 | 0.9003 | 1.42 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.5141 | 0.224 | 1.18 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.21 | 0.1526 | 0.3309 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.1032 | 0.0584 | 0.1458 | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.37 | 0.875 | 2.59 | 10 |
| 1960s | 1.83 | 1.65 | 1.99 | 10 |
| 1970s | 2.66 | 2.11 | 3.25 | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.29 | 3.08 | 3.48 | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.19 | 1.83 | 2.79 | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.31 | 2.18 | 2.5 | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.43 | 2.01 | 2.92 | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.08 | 1.9 | 2.23 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More climate change data for Cuba
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 70.05 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 12,131 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 3,149 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 8,982 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 11.88 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 320.8 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,054 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 500.27 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,554 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.89 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled in Cuba?
- Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled in Cuba was 2.23 in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 3.48 in 1982.
- What is the lowest co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0584 in 1949.
- How does Cuba rank for co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled?
- Cuba ranks 127th out of 213 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 8.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 169 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Co2 emissions vs gdp with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- CO₂ emissions per capita vs. GDP per capita Global Carbon Budget (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Co2 emissions vs gdp with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.