Co2 fossil plus land use in Austria
Austria: Co2 fossil plus land use was 55.70 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
55.70 million
Change on year
down 1.4%
World rank
61st
of 194 countries
All-time high
77.92 million
in 2005
All-time low
3.79 million
in 1919
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Co2 fossil plus land use in Austria, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, co2 fossil plus land use in Austria stood at 55.70 million.
The figure is down 1.4% on the previous year and down 13.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 fossil plus land use in Austria peaked at 77.92 million in 2005 and was at its lowest, 3.79 million, in 1919.
That places Austria 61st out of 194 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 fossil plus land use in Austria, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 6.15 million | — |
| 1851 | 6.10 million | -0.7% |
| 1852 | 6.55 million | +7.3% |
| 1853 | 6.97 million | +6.3% |
| 1854 | 6.84 million | -1.8% |
| 1855 | 7.46 million | +9.1% |
| 1856 | 7.86 million | +5.4% |
| 1857 | 8.58 million | +9.1% |
| 1858 | 11.01 million | +28.3% |
| 1859 | 9.53 million | -13.4% |
| 1860 | 10.29 million | +7.9% |
| 1861 | 10.52 million | +2.3% |
| 1862 | 10.63 million | +1.0% |
| 1863 | 10.23 million | -3.8% |
| 1864 | 9.49 million | -7.2% |
| 1865 | 9.89 million | +4.2% |
| 1866 | 8.14 million | -17.7% |
| 1867 | 9.61 million | +18.1% |
| 1868 | 10.75 million | +11.8% |
| 1869 | 11.27 million | +4.8% |
| 1870 | 12.22 million | +8.4% |
| 1871 | 15.14 million | +23.9% |
| 1872 | 15.06 million | -0.5% |
| 1873 | 15.81 million | +5.0% |
| 1874 | 14.27 million | -9.7% |
| 1875 | 13.08 million | -8.3% |
| 1876 | 13.38 million | +2.2% |
| 1877 | 12.64 million | -5.5% |
| 1878 | 12.65 million | +0.0% |
| 1879 | 14.24 million | +12.6% |
| 1880 | 29.01 million | +103.7% |
| 1881 | 15.55 million | -46.4% |
| 1882 | 15.86 million | +2.0% |
| 1883 | 17.05 million | +7.5% |
| 1884 | 16.72 million | -1.9% |
| 1885 | 17.32 million | +3.6% |
| 1886 | 16.72 million | -3.5% |
| 1887 | 17.60 million | +5.3% |
| 1888 | 17.25 million | -2.0% |
| 1889 | 18.22 million | +5.6% |
| 1890 | 18.79 million | +3.1% |
| 1891 | 20.84 million | +10.9% |
| 1892 | 20.50 million | -1.6% |
| 1893 | 23.84 million | +16.3% |
| 1894 | 24.42 million | +2.4% |
| 1895 | 26.67 million | +9.2% |
| 1896 | 27.78 million | +4.1% |
| 1897 | 29.59 million | +6.5% |
| 1898 | 31.06 million | +5.0% |
| 1899 | 31.45 million | +1.2% |
| 1900 | 34.58 million | +10.0% |
| 1901 | 35.28 million | +2.0% |
| 1902 | 32.74 million | -7.2% |
| 1903 | 32.79 million | +0.2% |
| 1904 | 34.43 million | +5.0% |
| 1905 | 35.84 million | +4.1% |
| 1906 | 41.54 million | +15.9% |
| 1907 | 50.14 million | +20.7% |
| 1908 | 67.53 million | +34.7% |
| 1909 | 51.21 million | -24.2% |
| 1910 | 64.48 million | +25.9% |
| 1911 | 54.16 million | -16.0% |
| 1912 | 55.93 million | +3.3% |
| 1913 | 64.68 million | +15.6% |
| 1914 | 52.77 million | -18.4% |
| 1915 | 37.90 million | -28.2% |
| 1916 | 11.22 million | -70.4% |
| 1917 | 5.10 million | -54.5% |
| 1918 | 4.60 million | -9.8% |
| 1919 | 3.79 million | -17.6% |
| 1920 | 15.35 million | +304.9% |
| 1921 | 20.20 million | +31.6% |
| 1922 | 19.28 million | -4.6% |
| 1923 | 18.52 million | -3.9% |
| 1924 | 20.73 million | +11.9% |
| 1925 | 19.72 million | -4.9% |
| 1926 | 19.21 million | -2.6% |
| 1927 | 20.81 million | +8.3% |
| 1928 | 21.86 million | +5.0% |
| 1929 | 24.88 million | +13.8% |
| 1930 | 19.30 million | -22.4% |
| 1931 | 18.28 million | -5.3% |
| 1932 | 15.25 million | -16.6% |
| 1933 | 14.17 million | -7.1% |
| 1934 | 13.54 million | -4.4% |
| 1935 | 13.59 million | +0.4% |
| 1936 | 13.21 million | -2.8% |
| 1937 | 14.73 million | +11.5% |
| 1938 | 5.16 million | -65.0% |
| 1939 | 5.66 million | +9.6% |
| 1940 | 6.81 million | +20.4% |
| 1941 | 7.51 million | +10.2% |
| 1942 | 8.22 million | +9.5% |
| 1943 | 9.37 million | +14.0% |
| 1944 | 9.15 million | -2.3% |
| 1945 | 4.33 million | -52.6% |
| 1946 | 12.64 million | +191.7% |
| 1947 | 17.68 million | +39.8% |
| 1948 | 24.44 million | +38.3% |
| 1949 | 26.60 million | +8.8% |
| 1950 | 20.44 million | -23.1% |
| 1951 | 22.51 million | +10.1% |
| 1952 | 21.21 million | -5.8% |
| 1953 | 20.69 million | -2.4% |
| 1954 | 23.37 million | +12.9% |
| 1955 | 27.81 million | +19.0% |
| 1956 | 26.89 million | -3.3% |
| 1957 | 27.92 million | +3.8% |
| 1958 | 26.86 million | -3.8% |
| 1959 | 27.58 million | +2.7% |
| 1960 | 30.23 million | +9.6% |
| 1961 | 31.02 million | +2.6% |
| 1962 | 32.44 million | +4.6% |
| 1963 | 35.48 million | +9.4% |
| 1964 | 37.40 million | +5.4% |
| 1965 | 35.71 million | -4.5% |
| 1966 | 36.68 million | +2.7% |
| 1967 | 37.54 million | +2.3% |
| 1968 | 40.11 million | +6.9% |
| 1969 | 42.44 million | +5.8% |
| 1970 | 48.43 million | +14.1% |
| 1971 | 50.01 million | +3.3% |
| 1972 | 52.64 million | +5.3% |
| 1973 | 56.57 million | +7.5% |
| 1974 | 53.76 million | -5.0% |
| 1975 | 50.85 million | -5.4% |
| 1976 | 55.33 million | +8.8% |
| 1977 | 53.97 million | -2.5% |
| 1978 | 54.33 million | +0.7% |
| 1979 | 59.15 million | +8.9% |
| 1980 | 51.05 million | -13.7% |
| 1981 | 54.15 million | +6.1% |
| 1982 | 49.61 million | -8.4% |
| 1983 | 48.54 million | -2.2% |
| 1984 | 51.36 million | +5.8% |
| 1985 | 51.34 million | -0.0% |
| 1986 | 50.86 million | -0.9% |
| 1987 | 56.17 million | +10.4% |
| 1988 | 51.26 million | -8.7% |
| 1989 | 51.70 million | +0.9% |
| 1990 | 61.60 million | +19.1% |
| 1991 | 64.12 million | +4.1% |
| 1992 | 58.03 million | -9.5% |
| 1993 | 58.75 million | +1.2% |
| 1994 | 59.25 million | +0.8% |
| 1995 | 61.94 million | +4.5% |
| 1996 | 65.51 million | +5.8% |
| 1997 | 66.24 million | +1.1% |
| 1998 | 68.22 million | +3.0% |
| 1999 | 65.73 million | -3.6% |
| 2000 | 64.96 million | -1.2% |
| 2001 | 68.58 million | +5.6% |
| 2002 | 70.42 million | +2.7% |
| 2003 | 77.11 million | +9.5% |
| 2004 | 76.80 million | -0.4% |
| 2005 | 77.92 million | +1.5% |
| 2006 | 76.30 million | -2.1% |
| 2007 | 74.23 million | -2.7% |
| 2008 | 73.88 million | -0.5% |
| 2009 | 67.06 million | -9.2% |
| 2010 | 71.48 million | +6.6% |
| 2011 | 69.60 million | -2.6% |
| 2012 | 66.81 million | -4.0% |
| 2013 | 67.77 million | +1.4% |
| 2014 | 64.12 million | -5.4% |
| 2015 | 65.67 million | +2.4% |
| 2016 | 66.19 million | +0.8% |
| 2017 | 68.91 million | +4.1% |
| 2018 | 66.18 million | -4.0% |
| 2019 | 67.26 million | +1.6% |
| 2020 | 61.38 million | -8.7% |
| 2021 | 65.23 million | +6.3% |
| 2022 | 61.22 million | -6.1% |
| 2023 | 56.51 million | -7.7% |
| 2024 | 55.70 million | -1.4% |
Austria compared with similar countries
- Austria's 55.70 million is above the median for high income countries, which is 36.71 million, 1.5× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Austria's 55.70 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 32.46 million, 1.7× the median. (50 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 fossil plus land use in Austria changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920 | +304.9% | 3.79 million | 15.35 million |
| 1946 | +191.7% | 4.33 million | 12.64 million |
| 1880 | +103.7% | 14.24 million | 29.01 million |
| 1916 | -70.4% | 37.90 million | 11.22 million |
| 1938 | -65.0% | 14.73 million | 5.16 million |
| 1917 | -54.5% | 11.22 million | 5.10 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 7.70 million | 6.10 million | 11.01 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 10.08 million | 8.14 million | 11.27 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 13.85 million | 12.22 million | 15.81 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 18.13 million | 15.55 million | 29.01 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 25.50 million | 18.79 million | 31.45 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 41.61 million | 32.74 million | 67.53 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 35.46 million | 3.79 million | 64.68 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 20.06 million | 15.35 million | 24.88 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 13.29 million | 5.16 million | 19.30 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 12.67 million | 4.33 million | 26.60 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 24.53 million | 20.44 million | 27.92 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 35.90 million | 30.23 million | 42.44 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 53.50 million | 48.43 million | 59.15 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 51.60 million | 48.54 million | 56.17 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 62.94 million | 58.03 million | 68.22 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 72.73 million | 64.96 million | 77.92 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 67.40 million | 64.12 million | 71.48 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 60.01 million | 55.70 million | 65.23 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Austria
More climate change data for Austria
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 100.61 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 6,277 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,277 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 5,000 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 4.82 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 178.59 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 868.87 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 847.05 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 21.83 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 3.2 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 fossil plus land use in Austria?
- Co2 fossil plus land use in Austria was 55.70 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 fossil plus land use recorded in Austria?
- The highest recorded value was 77.92 million in 2005.
- What is the lowest co2 fossil plus land use recorded in Austria?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.79 million in 1919.
- How does Austria rank for co2 fossil plus land use?
- Austria ranks 61st out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 fossil plus land use rising or falling in Austria?
- Over the last ten years it is down 13.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Austria data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 fossil plus land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).